AG 2016 10 17 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1. A covered employee who leaves the scene of an accident without a legitimate explanation prior to submission to drug /alcohol tests. 2. A covered employee who provides an insufficient volume of urine specimen or breath sample without a valid medical explanation. The medical evaluation shall take place within 5 days of the initial test attempt. 3. A covered employee whose urine sample has been verified by the MRO as substitute or adulterated. 4. A covered employee fails to appear for any test within a reasonable time, as determined by the employer, after being directed to do so by the employer. 5. A covered employee fails to remain at the testing site until the testing process is complete. 6. A covered employee fails to provide a urine specimen for any drug test required by Part 40 or DOT agency regulations. 7. A covered employee fails to permit the observation or monitoring of a specimen collection. 8. A covered employee fails or declines to take a second test the employer or collector has directed you to take. 9. A covered employee fails to undergo a medical examination or evaluation, as directed by the MRO as part of the verification process, or as directed by the employer as part of the "shy bladder" or "shy lung" procedures. 10. A covered employee fails to cooperate with any part of the testing process (e.g., refuse to empty pockets when so directed by the collector; behave in a confrontational way that disrupts the collection process). 11. Failure to sign Step 2 of the Alcohol Testing form. 12. Failure to follow the observer's interactions during an observed collection including interactions to raise your clothing above the waist, lower clothing and underpants, and to turn around to permit the observer to determine if you have any type of prosthetic or other device that could be used to interfere with the collection process. 13. Possess or wear a prosthetic or other device that could be used to interfere with the collection process. 14. Admit to the collector or MRO that you adulterated or substituted the specimen. P. If a DOT regulated employee is directed to submit to a collection under direct observation in accordance with 49 CFR Part 40.67, the policy administrator or supervisor must explain to the employee the reason for a directly observed collection. Circumstances requiring direct observation include: 1. All return to duty tests. 2. A follow -up tests. 3. Anytime the employee is directed to provide another specimen because the temperature on the original specimen was out of the acceptable temperature range. 4. Anytime the employee is directed to provide another specimen because the original specimen appeared to have an attempt to tamper with. 5. Anytime a collector observes materials brought to the collection site or the employee's conduct clearly indicates an attempt to tamper with a specimen. 6. Anytime the employee is directed to provide another specimen because the laboratory reported to the MRO that the original specimen was invalid and the MRO determined that there was not an adequate medical explanation for the results. 7. Anytime the employee is directed to provide another specimen because the MRO determined that the original specimen was positive, adulterated, or substituted, but had to be cancelled because the test of the split specimen could not be performed. 15 Attachment number 1 \n F -5 Page 93