My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2016 12 19
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2016
>
AG 2016 12 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2017 10:29:55 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 10:36:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/19/2016
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
allocated based on the proportion of total property value accounted for by each land use <br /> category. This "default"breakdown of assessed property valuation for 2007 was 75.3% <br /> residential, 23.7% commercial, and 1.0% agricultural. The expenditures of most of the county's <br /> general government departments were allocated in this manner. <br /> Revenues were handled in a manner similar to expenditures. Property tax revenues were <br /> allocated to specific land use categories based on the 2007 property assessments. Taxes and <br /> other revenue sources that are linked directly to commercial activities—for example, Article 39 <br /> sales taxes and cable TV franchise fees—were allocated exclusively to the commercial sector. <br /> Revenues from sources associated exclusively with households (such as animal control revenues) <br /> were allocated to the residential sector. Revenues raised by specific county government <br /> departments from fees charged for services or from inter-governmental transfers were allocated <br /> in direct proportion to the allocation of expenditures by those departments, unless respondents <br /> indicated otherwise. Any remaining revenues that could not be directly allocated in these ways <br /> were allocated according to the proportion of total property value accounted for by each land use <br /> category. <br /> Results <br /> A detailed breakdown of revenues sources is found in Appendix Table 1. Total county <br /> general fund revenues for 2006-2007 were $183.1 million. About 61.2% of this money came <br /> from ad valorem property taxes. Another 21.6% came from sales taxes. Most of the remainder <br /> (12.5%) came from fees for services and licenses, while the remaining 4.7% came from other <br /> miscellaneous sources (mainly investment earnings and state and federal grants). <br /> Table 1 summarizes the overall breakdown of county expenditures for the 2006-2007 <br /> fiscal year(more detailed information is found in Appendix Table 2). Of note is the fact that <br /> Gaston County ran a significant budget surplus of over$55 million in that year. This money was <br /> transferred out of the general fund into other funds for future uses—which, it was assumed, <br /> 4 The state distributes Article 39 sales tax revenues back to counties on a point-of-sale basis. Article 40 and 42 sales <br /> taxes are distributed back to counties based on county population;revenues from these sources were allocated to <br /> residential land uses. Article 44 sales taxes are distributed to counties in part on the basis of point of sale and in part <br /> on the basis of county population;accordingly,these were allocated to residential and commercial land uses on a 50- <br /> 50 basis. <br /> 4 <br /> G-4 Page 247 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.