My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2015 12 14
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2015
>
AG 2015 12 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2015 4:02:00 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 10:40:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/14/2015
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Coborrus County Transportation Services (CCTS) <br />Finol Report — September 2015 <br />Whenever possible, the desirable portions of the strategy were repackaged into a more <br />flexible combination of initiatives. <br />Package #1: Coordinated Out -of County Transportation - The preliminary Initiative <br />• An estimated 1,800 passenger trips 9 Initiative #2.2 - policy change to eliminate <br />were sent to Greater Charlotte last `medical only', in order to allow general public out -of- <br />year. The average trip length was county ridership, on a seats available basis. <br />11.6 miles each way. • Initiative #2.4 - adopt tighter eligibility <br />requirements that are universal for all four counties <br />The benefits of a Four County Coordinated Out -of- County Transportation can only be truly <br />quantified after the agreement has been crafted. The pie chart in Figure ES -1 below is an <br />example of which trips could be redistributed to neighboring Counties. The accompanying <br />table shows an example of how 100% of the 226 trips to Chapel Hill might be transferred to <br />SCUSA. <br />Attachment number 1 \n <br />F -3 Page 71 <br />#4.2 in Table ES -1 above, which called for inter -local <br />agreements to transfer trips between neighboring <br />Out -of County Medical <br />Counties, drew a lot of support. Discussion focused on <br />Transportation <br />the benefit of providing better service to the Midland <br />community, which was a major service gap identified <br />in the Locally Coordinated Plan. However, Stanly <br />• About 59% of all CCTS trips are <br />County (SCUSA) thought something more flexible <br />medical related. <br />than `Initiative #1.1 - daily runs from Midland to <br />• 6.3% of all medical trips are out of <br />Independence Boulevard would be more practical. The <br />county; this accounts for 9.1% of <br />inter -local agreement should also embrace: <br />all vehicle miles traveled. <br />• An estimated 1,800 passenger trips 9 Initiative #2.2 - policy change to eliminate <br />were sent to Greater Charlotte last `medical only', in order to allow general public out -of- <br />year. The average trip length was county ridership, on a seats available basis. <br />11.6 miles each way. • Initiative #2.4 - adopt tighter eligibility <br />requirements that are universal for all four counties <br />The benefits of a Four County Coordinated Out -of- County Transportation can only be truly <br />quantified after the agreement has been crafted. The pie chart in Figure ES -1 below is an <br />example of which trips could be redistributed to neighboring Counties. The accompanying <br />table shows an example of how 100% of the 226 trips to Chapel Hill might be transferred to <br />SCUSA. <br />Attachment number 1 \n <br />F -3 Page 71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.