Laserfiche WebLink
Cost Approach <br />38 <br />Replacement Cost vs. Market Value <br />Including <br />Excluding <br />Entrepreneurial <br />Entrepreneurial <br />Profit <br />Profit <br />Replacement Cost New <br />$1,826,641 <br />$1,660,583 <br />Land Value <br />$210,000 <br />$210,000 <br />Replacement Cost New Including Land Value <br />$2,036,641 <br />$1,870,583 <br />Rounded <br />$2,040,000 <br />$1,870,000 <br />Market Value Conclusion <br />$940,000 <br />$940,000 <br />MarketValueas % of RCN Including Land Value <br />46% <br />50% <br />Estimate of Depreciation <br />Depreciation is the difference between the replacement cost new of the improvements and their <br />contribution to overall property value on the effective date of the appraisal. <br />Deferred Maintenance <br />No items of deferred maintenance are identified; thus, no deductions for this form of depreciation are <br />necessary. <br />Age -Life Depreciation <br />After deduction deferred maintenance, if any, we use the age -life method to estimate depreciation <br />applicable to the remaining replacement costs. This method includes the loss in value due to physical <br />deterioration and some functional obsolescence based on the age and condition of the improvements. <br />The age -life method is applied on a straight -line basis, by dividing the subject's effective age by its <br />economic. Age -life depreciation for the site improvements is estimated separately from the building <br />improvements, based on their shorter economic lives. <br />Functional Obsolescence <br />Functional obsolescence is a loss in value due to changes in market tastes and standards. In the case of <br />the subject, it is not necessary to make a deduction for additional functional obsolescence over and <br />above that accounted for in the age -life method. <br />External Obsolescence <br />External obsolescence is a loss in value due to external causes, such as imbalances in supply and <br />demand or negative location influences. A deduction for external obsolescence is not considered <br />necessary for the subject. <br />The Glenn Center <br />i <br />H -5 Page 371 <br />