My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2011 01 18
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2011
>
AG 2011 01 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:44:42 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:13:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
1/18/2011
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
556
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cabarrus County 2010 Community Survey <br />Importance- Satisfaction Rating <br />Cabarrus County <br />OVERALL ISSUES FOR THE COUNTY <br />Medium Priority (IS <.10) <br />Crime prevention <br />Availability of housing options <br />Water supply <br />Emergency law enforcement response <br />Pace of growth <br />Citizen involvement in decision - making <br />Emergency medical response <br />Services for people with disabilities <br />Emergency fire response <br />Open space preservation <br />Historic landmark preservation <br />31% <br />Most <br />Importance - <br />6 <br />0.0961 <br />Most Important <br />Satisfaction Satisfaction <br />I -S Rating <br />Category of Service <br />Important % Rank Satisfaction % <br />Rank Rating <br />Rank <br />High Priority (IS .10-.20) <br />7 <br />0.0589 <br />41% <br />Employment opportunities <br />43% 1 35% <br />12 0.2795 <br />r� <br />Medium Priority (IS <.10) <br />Crime prevention <br />Availability of housing options <br />Water supply <br />Emergency law enforcement response <br />Pace of growth <br />Citizen involvement in decision - making <br />Emergency medical response <br />Services for people with disabilities <br />Emergency fire response <br />Open space preservation <br />Historic landmark preservation <br />31% <br />5 <br />69% <br />6 <br />0.0961 <br />17% <br />7 <br />64% <br />9 <br />0.0612 <br />19% <br />6 <br />69% <br />7 <br />0.0589 <br />41% <br />2 <br />86% <br />3 <br />0.0574 <br />13% <br />8 <br />58% <br />11 <br />0.0546 <br />10% <br />10 <br />61% <br />10 <br />0.0390 <br />34% <br />3 <br />90% <br />2 <br />0.0340 <br />10% <br />9 <br />66% <br />8 <br />0.0340 <br />32% <br />4 <br />93% <br />1 <br />0.0224 <br />7% <br />11 <br />70% <br />4 <br />0.0210 <br />5% <br />12 <br />70% <br />5 <br />0.0150 <br />Note: The I - S Rating is calculated by multiplying the "Most Important" % by (1= Satisfaction' %) <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />Most Important %: The "Most Important" percentage represents the sum of the first, second, and third <br />most important responses for each item. Respondents were asked to identify <br />the items they thought were most important <br />Satisfaction %: The "Satisfaction" percentage represents the sum of the ratings "9 -8" and 7-6" excluding 'don't kno% <br />Respondents ranked their level of satisfaction with the each of the items on a scale <br />of 1 to 9 with "8 -9" being very satisfied and "4 -1" being dissatisfied. <br />© 2010 DirectionFinder by ETC Institute <br />ETC Institute (Dec 2010) Alm number 2 <br />G -4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.