My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2011 01 18
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2011
>
AG 2011 01 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:44:42 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:13:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
1/18/2011
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
556
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
North Carolina's seasonally adjusted unemployment rate <br />in October was 9.6 %, down 0.1 percentage points from <br />September. The decrease in the unemployment rate is due <br />to discouraged workers dropping out of the labor force, <br />not employment gains. The state's unemployment rate is <br />1.3 percentage point lower than it was in October 2009, <br />but 4.7 percentage points higher than it was at the start of <br />the recession. In October, the national unemployment <br />rate was 9.6% and recently released U.S. data has the <br />national unemployment rate for November at 9.8 %. <br />NC Labor Levels +LaborForce <br />Jan. 2010 - Oct. 2010 #Employed <br />4,700,000 <br />4,500,000 —.—�� <br />4,300,000 <br />4,100, 000 M — <br />3,900,000 <br />3,700,000 <br />N. C. Employment Security Commission, Lob or Force Statistics <br />A leading indicator of future unemployment rates are initial unemployment benefit claims. New initial <br />claimants totaled 57,144 in October, an increase of 10,394 from September. Claims are still elevated above <br />pre- recession levels but have been displaying a downward trend since January of 2009. The top five <br />occupations of those claiming unemployment for the first time are: 1) Laborers and Freight, Stock, & Material <br />Movers (hand); 2) Truck Drivers, Heavy and Tractor - Trailer; 3) Cashiers; 4) Production Workers, All Other; 5) <br />Helpers of Production Workers. 62% of the workers in the top twenty occupations fall into three major <br />occupational categories: Construction and Extraction, Production and Transportation & Material Moving. <br />Unemployrmnt rates, continue wjear4ong declining trend statewide and formost countles <br />Unemployment rates are declining for most counties in North Carolina. In October only two counties had <br />unemployment rates at or above 14 %, Edgecombe and Scotland Counties. Three counties have an <br />unemployment rate below 6% this month, compared to only two counties below 6% in September of this year. <br />The counties below 6% this month are Hyde (5.9 %), Orange (5.5 %), and Currituck (4.9 %). Five of the 10 <br />counties with the lowest unemployment rate for October were in the Northeast Partnership ED Region. While <br />Currituck, Chatham, Hyde, Dare, and Orange counties have been among the top 5 counties in unemployment <br />for the last five months Camden has moved into the top 5 since September. When looking at unemployed <br />population totals Mecklenburg County has the largest number of unemployed workers in the state. They make <br />up nearly 11% of the unemployed population and 10.2% of the total state labor force. <br />Twelve Month Unemployment Rate by County (November 2009 — October 2010) <br />Unemployment Rate <br />6.3 %- 7.8% (75% or less of state average) <br />7.8 %- 10.4% (Below state average) <br />- 10.4% - 13.0% (Above state average) mingtan <br />- 13.0% -16.1% (125% or more of state avenge) <br />Interstate <br />T u e I v a <br />State's current seasonally adjusted monthly unemployment rate is 9.6% - NORTH <br />Map Created December 2010 i Source: NC Employment Security Commission. County data is not seasonally adjusted. Data at <br />the state level used for purposes of comparison is over the same time period as county data, and has been seaso adjusted. C AROLINA <br />Policy, Research & Strategic Planning; November 2010 Report <br />AN number 2 <br />1 -1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.