Laserfiche WebLink
Draft 1.1— For Discussion Only, Not for Citation <br />Growing the Cabarrus Economy from the Inside Out: <br />Part I <br />By Michael H. Shuman' <br />Overview <br />By any standard, Cabarrus County is economically struggling. A once - thriving <br />manufacturing region has seen some of its biggest employers, like Pillowtex and Philip <br />Morris, shut down plants over the past decade and lay off thousands of workers. <br />Unemployment in the county now is 9.7%, well above the national average. According <br />to state data released in September 2011, about 8,000 of the official workforce of 83,117 <br />are unemployed. For these residents, who have had to endure the most extreme economic <br />hardships since the Great Depression, a fresh approach is clearly needed. The economic - <br />development practices and policies in the County by themselves, which have largely <br />focused on outside business attraction, have proven insufficient. More must be done to <br />put residents back to work. <br />According to the Economic Development Council of Cabarrus County, its recruitment <br />initiatives between 2004 and 2011 yielded 2,711 jobs—or 339 jobs per year. At that rate, <br />under the assumption that there's no worsening of j ob- creation challenges with new <br />residents moving in, existing practices would end unemployment in about 24 years. The <br />challenge is greater still, however, because a number of questions must be answered <br />before the County can have high confidence that EDC initiatives actually created 2,711 <br />jobs. For example, because Cabarrus County has many attractive features for global <br />companies – among them, low -cost land, an educated workforce, and excellent access to <br />transportation links and nearby markets – it may turn out that some of these companies <br />would have come here anyway even if the EDC has done nothing. <br />This paper doesn't argue, however, that traditional corporate attraction practices should <br />be abandoned. Rather, government -led industrial policy should be supplemented with <br />private- sector -led entrepreneurship policy. The County should consider taking a more <br />balanced approach that split public money and civil servants' time evenly between <br />attracting outside businesses and nurturing local businesses. The case for increasing <br />Cabarrus County investment in local businesses rests on the following observations (all <br />elaborated in this report): <br />• Local businesses are currently the only significant producers of jobs in the <br />United States. <br />' Michael H. Shuman is Director of Research for Cutting Edge Capital, based in Oakland, California. He is <br />a Stanford- educated economist, attorney, and author. His latest book is The Small -Mart Revolution: How <br />Local Businesses Are Beating the Global Competition (Berrett- Koehler, 2006), and is available <br />at www.small- mart.org For comments on this paper or to conduct similar analysis of another community, <br />contact Michael H. Shuman by phone (202- 669- 1220), e -mail ( shuman @igc.orj) or mail (2203 Quinton <br />Rd., Silver Spring, MD 20910). <br />Attachment number 1 <br />1 -4 Page 303 <br />