Laserfiche WebLink
Draft 1.1— For Discussion Only, Not for Citation <br />reliance Cabarrus could create 28,292 new jobs based just on local demand, and they <br />would pay $1.2 billion in additional annual wages. Capturing 25% of these jobs would <br />mean about 7,073 new jobs — enough to put almost every unemployed resident back to <br />work. <br />A more comprehensive leakage analysis is possible using IMPLAN, the Minnesota Input - <br />Output Model used extensively by economic development agencies nationwide. <br />IMPLAN corrects, unifies, and fills in gaps (like farmers and self - employed individuals) <br />in the Economic Census data. It also can model how changes in one industry can lead to <br />changes in other local industries (indirect effects) and changes in local personal <br />consumption (induced effects). A leakage analysis with IMPLANS finds that 25% <br />localization would generate 9,491 new jobs: 5,208 directly, 2,157 indirectly, and 2,127 <br />induced. IMPLAN predicts, moreover, that these new jobs will lead to $397 million <br />more in wages each year, $676 million in additional annual value -added production, and <br />$59 million in indirect business taxes. <br />Leakage analysis identifies possible jobs from local demand. But it's important to vet <br />what's possible for what's really plausible. Natural resource and other constraints <br />probably will prevent the county from realizing 171 of the jobs or about 3% of the <br />direct jobs. Whether the other 97% are plausible depends on local efforts to mobilize <br />entrepreneurship, local- business partnerships, local purchasing, and local capital. The <br />models for sucessful small businesses in all these sectors certainly exist in the United <br />States, and the challenge for a new approach to economic- development is to identify, <br />study, and replicate these models locally (most of these models can be found regionally <br />as well). <br />The choice of a 25% shift — as opposed to a 100% shift — assumes that 75% of these <br />opportunities for import substitution will be missed. Some will be regarded as <br />impractical. Some won't find the right entrepreneur or sufficient capital. Some will fail <br />in execution. Readers who regard a 25% shift as still too ambitious a baseline are <br />encouraged to shrink all these findings accordingly. Chart I summarizes our leakage <br />findings for both a 25% shift and a more modest 10% shift. <br />Chart 1 <br />Economic Impacts of 10% and 25% Shifts <br />25% Shift 10 %Shift <br />New Jobs <br />9,491 <br />4,745 <br />New Annual Wages <br />$397,015,692 <br />$198,507,846 <br />New Annual Value Added <br />$676,440,641 <br />$338,220,320 <br />New State & Local Tax Revenues <br />1 $61,189,839 <br />$30,594,920 <br />The local - living- economy approach to economic development prioritizes programs that <br />not only cost little public money but also, over time, make money. These approaches are <br />called meta - businesses, because like all businesses they cash now but their "market" is <br />the population of local businesses in Cabarrus County. An example might be a business- <br />3 <br />Attachment number 1 <br />1 -4 Page 305 <br />