Laserfiche WebLink
N O R T H C A R O L I N A <br />ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />LEGISLATIVE BRIEF: TRANSPORTATION <br />2009-10 legislative coals <br />Transportation Funding -Oppose legislation shifting the state's existing responsibility for <br />funding transportation construction and maintenance projects to county governments. <br />Rural Transportation Planning Organizations -Support legislation providing continued <br />funding of rural transportation planning organizations (RPOs), enabling increased participation in <br />transportation planning for the state's non-urban areas by local governments. Long-range <br />transportation plans drafted by RPOs or MPOs should be submitted to member boards of county <br />commissioners for review and comment prior to being submitted to the North Carolina <br />Department of Transportation. <br />Background <br />Funding the state's transportation system has been a major focus for the first year of Governor Beverly <br />Perdue's term. Long-range forecasts show that the state's current revenue structure for transportation is <br />woefully inadequate to address the state's needs and will result in a shortfall of as much as $65 billion <br />over the next 20 years. <br />The Association's primary interest is to make sure that responsibility for funding maintenance or <br />enhancements to secondary roads is not shifted to counties. The secondary road system is currently <br />funded through two sources. The Highway Fund and Highway Trust Fund monies are used to pave <br />unpaved roads and to improve existing paved secondary roads. In 2008-09, these funds generated more <br />than $159 million for secondary road construction. The DOT also appropriates monies from its general <br />fund for resurfacing and maintenance. In 2008-09, the DOT appropriated $390 million for resurfacing and <br />maintenance of secondary roads. <br />In 2007, the General Assembly's Fiscal Research Division conducted a Justification Review of the <br />Highway Fund and Highway Trust Fund Secondary Roads Program. This review concluded that the state <br />should "reduce or eliminate" these funding programs and "reconsider the State's role in funding local <br />roads and streets." The 2007 General Assembly did not act upon those recommendations. <br />Outlook for 2010 <br />This issue is receiving a lot of scrutiny. Governor Perdue has created a Logistics Task Force to make <br />recommendations to ensure that people and goods are able to move efficiently across North Carolina. <br />Transportation Secretary Gene Conti has appointed the Intergovernmental Transportation Advisory <br />Taskforce to focus on three major areas: federal transportation reauthorization; land-use planning <br />involving school construction; Communication and Education of DOT/local government processes. The <br />General Assembly's Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Transportation also monitors <br />transportation issues. <br />S758 (Transfer Secondary Roads to Counties) was introduced in 2009 by Sens. Bob Rucho and Dan <br />Clodfelter of Mecklenburg County. The bill would create two road systems in the state: a system of <br />"primary" roads over which the state would maintain responsibility, and a system of secondary roads over <br />which counties would become responsible. The bill provides funding for construction, but not for <br />maintenance. No action was taken on the bill, but it is eligible in 2010. The NCACC opposes S758. This <br />bill would negatively impact every county, particularly rural counties with small tax bases and a lot of <br />secondary roads. Bertie County would need to raise property taxes by 24.5 cents to generate enough <br />revenue to continue funding at current levels. In recent weeks, Governor Perdue and Transportation <br />Secretary Conti have both publicly told the NCACC they do not support this cost-shift to counties. <br />February 5, 2010 <br />G-4 <br />Attachment number 5 <br />Page 129 <br />