Laserfiche WebLink
Legislative Issues from Staff: <br />Moratorium on new or expanded exemptions and deferments -Every session <br />the General Assembly creates new or expands existing property tax exemptions <br />and deferments. We have reached the point that we cannot analyze and report the <br />impact of the latest changes before additional changes or additions are made. We <br />feel it is important to fully analyze the impact of recent legislative changes before <br />any new initiatives are launched. <br />Determine an earlier hard deadline for late applications for exemption, <br />deferment or tax relief -the General Statutes are silent regarding specific <br />deadlines for late applications for exemptions and deferments. As a result <br />property owners may literally walk into a tax office on December 31 and submit a <br />late application for exemption. The tax assessors and collectors believe a June 30 <br />deadline would provide an ample six month time frame for the submission of any <br />application for exemption or deferment. <br />General clarification of terminology and definitions used in exemptions and <br />deferral programs: charity care, charitable, sound management, gratuitous <br />use, endangered wildlife, etc. The ambiguous terminology found in the <br />Machinery Act leaves much to be desired in interpreting the law. <br />All annexations -voluntary or involuntary - to be effective on June 30 -this <br />is already a priority goal of the NCACC as suggested by the assessors and <br />collectors for the 2009 session. <br />Increase the January interest for unpaid annual taxes to 5% -the interest rate <br />for unpaid registered motor vehicle taxes in the first month was changed to 5% <br />several years ago to help pay for the new combined "moto-tax" system to be <br />launched in July 2011. The reason tax collectors would like a similar interest <br />amount for the first month of delinquency is to help offset the costs of enforced <br />collections. As in the case of unpaid registered vehicles, it makes sense for those <br />who create the need for enforced collections to help offset the costs of <br />enforcement. <br />Standardized approach to municipal vehicle fees - in the 2009 session counties <br />were given the authority to levy a motor vehicle fee in a similar manner as the <br />City of Winston-Salem and the Town of Kernersville. The law governing vehicle <br />fees allow cities and counties to adopt varying rules as to which vehicles are <br />subject to such fees. The Division of Motor Vehicles has asked that all cities and <br />counties levy the fee similarly so that the new "moto-tax" system can be <br />programmed and applied consistently. <br />SB 117 would prohibit the use of moratoria adopted "for the purpose of <br />developing and adopting new or amended ordinances." In other words, prohibit <br />them for any useful purpose. <br />SB761 could be a benefit or detriment to us. It would limit off-site improvements <br />required for development. As the some times developer of property we would <br />probably be happy to not have to fix roads like Union Cemetery, but as regulators <br />there are cases where there is a direct result from the development that is being <br />addressed by required improvements. <br />Attachment number 6 <br />G-4 Page 130 <br />