Laserfiche WebLink
addition, they are useful in distributing to the new property owners the costs of the <br />infrastructure required by new development. <br />C. Spending. <br />1. The fourth major power that has been delegated from the North Carolina General <br />Assembly to local governments is the power to make expenditures in the public interest. <br />Hazard mitigation principles should be made a routine part of all spending decisions <br />made by the local government, including annual budgets and a Capital Improvement Plan <br />(CIP). <br />2. A CIP is a schedule for the provision of municipal or county services over a specified <br />period of time. Capital programming, by itself, can be used as a growth management <br />technique, with a view to hazard mitigation. By tentatively committing itself to a <br />timetable for the provision of capital to extend services, a community can control its <br />growth to some extent especially where the surrounding area is such that the provision of <br />on -site sewage disposal and water supply are unusually expensive. <br />3. In addition to formulating a timetable for the provision of services, a local community <br />can regulate the extension of and access to services. A CIP that is coordinated with <br />extension and access policies can provide a significant degree of control over the location <br />and timing of growth. These tools can also influence the cost of growth. If the CIP is <br />effective in directing growth away from environmentally sensitive or high hazard areas, <br />for example, it can reduce environmental costs. <br />D. Local Funds. In the State of North Carolina, property taxes provide the primary source of <br />revenue for counties. These taxes are typically used primarily to finance services that must be <br />available and delivered on a daily basis, such as schools, health and social services, planning, <br />solid waste management, and emergency services, leaving very little, if any, for additional <br />services and projects. Fortunately, State and Federal funds are available to local governments <br />for the development and implementation of hazard mitigation programs. <br />E. Non - Governmental Funds. Another potential source of revenue for local mitigation <br />efforts, are the contribution of non - governmental organizations, such as churches, charities, <br />community relief funds, the Red Cross, hospitals, for - profit businesses, and nonprofit <br />organizations. A variety of these local organizations can be tapped to help carry out local <br />hazard mitigation initiatives. <br />F. State and Federal Funds <br />1. There are many sources of Federal and State funding available to local governments <br />for the purpose of implementing hazard mitigation plans. These programs include Hazard <br />Mitigation Grants, Flood Mitigation Assistance Programs, and the Community <br />Development Block Grants. <br />2. The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) provides funding for mitigation <br />measures following a presidential disaster declaration. The HMGP is funded in most part <br />by the Federal government and administered by respective sate governments. HMGP <br />Annex C County Capability Assessment C -7 December 2009 <br />Attachment number 11 <br />F -6 Page 143 <br />