Laserfiche WebLink
Cabarrus County, North Carolina <br />Notes to the Financial Statements <br />For the Year Ended June 30, 2010 <br />Annual OPEB Cost and Net Pension Obligation. The County's annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on <br />the annual required contribution of the employer (ARC), an amount actuarially determined in accordance with the <br />parameters of GASB Statement 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis is <br />projected to cover normal cost each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a <br />period not to exceed thirty years. The following table shows the components of the County's annual OPEB cost for <br />the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and changes in the County's net OPEB obligation for the <br />healthcare benefits: <br />2010 <br />Annual Required Contribution <br />$ 2,513,177 <br />Interest on Net OPEB Obligation <br />116,804 <br />Adjustment to annual required contribution <br />(100,772) <br />Annual OPEB cost (expense) <br />2,529,209 <br />Contributions made <br />(676,712) <br />Increase (decrease) in net OPEB obligation <br />1,852,497 <br />Net OPEB obligation, beginning of year <br />2,912,737 <br />Net OPEB obligation, end of year <br />The County's annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB <br />obligation were as follows: <br />For Year Ended Annual Percentage of Annual Net OPEB <br />June 30 OPEB Cost OPEB Cost Contributed Obli gation <br />2008 $1,850,169 28% $1,341,176 <br />2009 $2,156,844 27% $2,912,737 <br />2010 $2,529,209 27% $4,765,234 <br />Funded Status and Funding Progress. As of December 31, 2008 the most recent actuarial valuation date, the plan <br />was not funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits and, thus the unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) <br />was $25;198,592. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was $31,224,203 <br />and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 80.7 %. Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve <br />estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of occurrence of events far into <br />the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality and healthcare trends. Amounts <br />determined regarding the funded status of the plan and the annual required contributions of the employer are <br />subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made <br />about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the <br />notes to the financial statements, presents multiyear trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan <br />assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. <br />Actuarial Methods and Assumptions. Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are used on the <br />substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and the plan members) and include the types of benefits <br />provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer <br />and plan members at this point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are <br />designed to reduce the effects of short term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value assets, <br />consistent with the long term perspective of the calculations. <br />In the December 31, 2008 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method was used. The <br />actuarial assumptions included a 4.00% investment rate of return (net of administrative expenses), which is the <br />expected long -term investment return on the employer's own investments calculated based on the funded level of <br />the plan at the valuation date, and an annual medical cost trend increase of 10.50 to 5.00 percent annually. Both <br />rates included a 3.75 percent inflation assumption. The actuarial value of assets, if any, was determined using <br />techniques that spread the effects of short term volatility in the market value of investments over a five year period. <br />67 <br />G -2 Page 555 <br />