AG 2009 07 20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLAN COMMENTS: t ^ Pre-submittal meeting between developer and/or designer and reviewers is highly recommended, preferably onsite. ^ River Stream Overlay Dishict/Zone on Coddle Creek h ibutary, aremarked as required by the cotuity zanuig ordinance and pel7nit CESAW-C088-N-013-0061 issued under Section 404 of the U. S. Clean Water Act {33 U.S.C. 1413) by the US An7ny Corps of Engneers. ^ Unless developer has prior authorization from appropriate federal and state authorities to impact jurisdictional waters or wetlands, the proposed project will be in violation federal and/or state law. Permits for disturbauce of streams and other wetlands must be requested from N. C. Division of Water Quality and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to any impacts. ^ This project is within a hydrological unit (HU) included nt the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program's Upper Rocky River Watershed Plan area and drains into a restoration prafect that is in design chase. Every effort should be made to use best management practices to prevent water quality hnpahrnent and follow recommendations in the Watershed Management Plans & Recanznendations, Lower Yadkin / Upper Ro ~ River Bashi Local Watershed Planning-Phase'Two. A key recomnnendation is low impact development techniques patterned on pre-development stortmvater runoff conditions. The erosion attd sedimentation control plan for this site should be followed closely once it has been submitted and approved. ^ The proposed development is approxunately 800 feet upsheann froln the confluence of Indian Run with Coddle Creek. Coddle Creek received an "Unpaired" water quality toting in the 2003 Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basinwide Water Quality Plan. The plan notes that "... nou-point source pollution, largely from stormwater runoff in and around Concord and Kannapolis, is likely a significant factor." Accorduig to the Plan, "Population is projected to increase .... 53 percent in CabalYVS County... beriveen 2000 and 2020. Growth management within the next five years will be imperative, especially in and around urbanizing areas and along highway corridors, in order to protect or improve water quality in this subbasin. Growth management can be defined as the application of strategies and practices that help achieve sustainable development in harmony with the conservation of environmental qualities and features of an area. On the local level, growth management often involves planning and development reviews that are designed to maintain or improve water quality:' '; ^ A conservation easement on all stream buffers is requested by Cabartus Soil and Water Conservation District to protect stream xestoration project downstream. This request is also part of the countywide open space initiative. See brochure "This Land is Our Land... A Guide for Preserving Your Land for Generations to Come. " ^ Impacts of storni~vater from this proposed project on water quality and water quantity leave not been assessed. Cities of Concord and Kannapolis have applied to the NC Div. of Water Resources for an interbasiii ttansfer of water certificate. Other jurisdictions receiving water from these municipalities are bound by the conditions of)BT certificate's drought management plan. Under Phis certificate, stream buffers will be determined by a qualified professional to ensure proper application of stream buffer rttles. ^ Cumulative and secondary impacts associated with this proposed development are not known and should be assessed prior to final plan approval. ^ The following prime farmland soil will be removed from production: CuB2. Farmland Conversion Impact Rating form (AD- 1006) must be filed if federal fiends are involved. Redesign of plan to provide for more open space protection of this soil is encouraged. ^ The following soil are classified as important state farmland soils and will be removed fl•am production: CuD2 and EnB. ^ The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition, but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation}. The numbers in the value column range from 0.01 to 1A0. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation. Limiting features in ': this report are limited to the top S lhnitations. Additional limitations may exist. _____..._.. ..._._._~._. _~~_._r_.__-__._ Dtvellings without Dwellings tvttlt Sntall Commercial Local Roads and Lawns and Shallow Excavations Asap Soil Basements Basements Buildings Sfreets _ __Landscaping Symbo! Niamc Rating Class and Rating Class and Rating Class and ((IRating Class and ~ Rating Class and ( Rating Class and Limiting Features - Limiting Features - Limiting Features - ILtntiting Features - Limiting Features - (Limiting Features - Value ~ Value Value Valuc Value Value _ _ ___~ - Sotnewltat [imited Somewhat limited Somewhat limited f Somewhat limited Somewhat limited 1 CuB2 Cullen ~ Shrink-swell - 0.5 Shriek-swell - 0.5 Shrinkp--swell - 0.5 I Shrink-swegtl~- O.S ~ Too clayey - 0.72 ( Not limited i ~ ~ Slo e - 0.13 Low stren - 0 Cutbanks cave - 0.1 ^ Somewhat limited ~ Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Somewhat limited CuD2 Cullen Slope - 0.63 ~ Slope - 0.63 Slope -1 Slope - 0.63 Too clayey - 0.72 Somewhat limited Shrink-swell - 0.5 {Shrink-swell - 0.5 Shrink-swell - 0.5 Shrink-swell - 0.5 Slope - 0.63 Slope - 0.63 i Low streugth - 0 Cutbanks cave - p, l __._.~.. ._.....~._--•----°..___--._-- ---- ------_.T_-_ - - Very limited Very ]imited Very limited Somewhat limned EnB Enon Shrink-swell - I ~ Not limited Shrink-swell - I Low strength -1 Too clayey - 0.28 ~ Not limited Slope - 0.13 Sluink-swell -1 Cutbatrks cave - 0.1 l l _ ~ - ---- --- ( Very Ihnited f Very limited Very limited Very limited Slope - I Very limited Slope -1 Very limited Slope -1 PoP Poindexter Slope -1 ~ Depth to soft Slope -1 Slope - 1 Depth to soft Depth to bedrock - bedrock - 0.46 ~ Low strength - 0.22 bedrock - 0.46 0.46 Cutbanks cave - 0.1 ~ag0 2 Of 4 ~ Attachment number 4 G_7 Page 442 of 627