Laserfiche WebLink
June 2009 - Planning & Zoning Draft Meeting Minutes <br />Mr. Koch said yes, he supposes that is possible. <br />Mr. Scribner said that is why he is saying his subdivision is still the same as it has always been; <br />that is why he is getting caught in this. <br />Mr. Koch said except you granted an easement voluntarily that basically goes across this <br />property somewhere that affects what your proposed plat indicates. He said Mr. Scribner does <br />not have enough information here, at this point seemingly, to be able to show exactly how it does <br />affect your existing preliminary plat. <br />Mr. Scribner does not have an engineered drawing from the pipeline company to stick onto it; <br />that is correct. He said they gave him the same type of drawing that Dennis had dropped on his <br />piece of paper that the board has. That is what they gave him and he still has the document with <br />him. He said that is all they have ever given him, in November 2007 or shortly there after. He <br />said they have never back in contact with him even though he as requested it. <br />The Chair thinks at this point they are clear on the issue and on the options unless someone has <br />specific questions. <br />Mr. Testerman did not mention with this late breaking information about the erosion and <br />sedimentation control plan. <br />The Chair asked Mr. Testerman to clarify exactly what information he is talking about. <br />Mr. Testerman said this a Phase I Sediment and Erosion Control Plan dated March 17, 2008; <br />showing that this farm pond which is to be buffered under the River/Stream Overlay Zone, water <br />body buffer, in fact is being converted to an erosion control feed or sediment pond or something <br />of that nature; water going into it. He said this drawing which is a Phase II site grading and <br />drainage plan and in fact shows some fill material being introduced into the buffer area. He also <br />shows where the fill material is on the erosion control plan that was shown earlier. <br />Mr. Testerman said in terms of where his Board would come down on this, he thinks there would <br />be concerned about having trees removed for grading activities and what that slope gets <br />replanted with and all of that issue. He thinks the impression they had and their hope was that <br />they would be inheriting an area that was an old farm pond and over grown fields that had grown <br />up in timber. He said if you look at the 1956 photo stuff had started coming back in at that point <br />and should have some trees out there that are pushing 50 years old. It looks like we are going to <br />be loosing some of that indigenous to a gas pipeline at some location and other places grading <br />and fill material is being introduced or erosion control features replaced with new vegetation. He <br />said you are loosing part of what he thinks is the value that the Board is looking for in primary <br />open space. <br />The Chair asked if these drawings have been submitted to NCDENR or to the County Erosion <br />Control Department. <br />Attachment number 9 <br />Page 81 of 315 <br />E-1 <br />