Laserfiche WebLink
ra~C ~ ut ~+ <br />course of conducting public outreach and involvement activities. Recipients and subrecipients have wide <br />latitude to determine what specific measures are most appropriate and should make this determination <br />based on the composition of the population affected by the recipient's action, the type of public <br />involvement process planned by the recipient, and the resources available to the agency. <br />a. Public outreach and involvement activities commonly undertaken by FTA recipients and subrecipients <br />include: <br />(1) Providing notice and affording members of the public the opportunity to Comment on proposed <br />service and fare changes. <br />(2) Providing members of the public the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process for <br />projects subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), including providing members of the <br />public the opportunity to comment on Environmental Assessments (EA) and Environmental Impact <br />Statements (EIS) prepared by the recipient. <br />(3) Providing members of the public the opportunity to participate in the agency's strategic planning or <br />capital improvement planning process or to comment on the agency's strategic plan or capital <br />improvement program <br />(4) Offering the public routine opportunities to provide feedback on a transit agency's level and quality <br />of service. <br />b. Examples of Efforts to Involve Minority and Low-income Populations in the Decision-making <br />Process. Recipient and subrecipient's efforts to involve minority and low-income persons in these and <br />other public involvement activities can include both comprehensive measures, such as placing public <br />notices at all stations and in all vehicles, and measures targeted to overcome linguistic, institutional, <br />cultural, economic, historical, or other barriers that may prevent minority and low-income persons and <br />populations from effectively participating in a recipient's decision-making process. Examples include: <br />(1) Coordination with individuals, institutions, or organizations to reach out to members in the affected <br />minority and/or low-income communities. <br />(2) Provision of opportunities for public participation through means other than written communication, <br />such as personal interviews or use of audio or video recording devices to capture oral comments. <br />(3) Use of locations, facilities, and meeting times that are local, convenient and accessible to disabled, <br />low-income, and minority communities. <br />(4) Use of different meeting sizes or formats, or variation in the type and number of news media used to <br />announce public participation opportunities, so that communications are tailored to the particular <br />community or population. <br />(5) Implementing DOT's policy guidance concerning recipients' responsibilities to LEP persons to <br />overcome barriers to public participation. <br />(6) Providing assistance to people with disabilities, including individuals who are blind, have low- <br />vision, or are hearing impaired. <br />4. LANGUAGE ACCESS. In order to campiy with 49 CFR §21.5(bx7), recipients and subrecipients <br />shall administer programs and activities consistent with the DOT Policy Guidance Concerning <br />Recipients' Responsibilities to Limited English Proficient Persons. This guidance instructs recipients <br />and subrecipients to prepare and maintain a copy of their implementation plan on language assistance. <br />The development of an implementation plan for language assistance will allow recipients and <br />subrecipients to take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to their programs by LEP persons as <br />set out in the DOT Guidance on LEP. The implementation plan on language assistance should include <br />the following components: <br />a. Recipients and subrecipients should identify individuals who need language assistance and prepare a <br />needs assessment that should include: <br />(i) The number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered by a <br />progam, activity, or service; <br />(2) The frequency with which those persons come into contact with the program; and <br />1/lb/2007 <br />`''t <br />