Laserfiche WebLink
~~~ SITE EVAL[IATION <br />... <br />• Site I -the current Sheriff s Department sniff parking hx, located immediaeely adjacent to the existing jail. This site was <br />previously evaluated, under different programmatic requirements, in the jail facilities needs assessment presenred in 2002. <br />• Site 2 -the surface parking lot located immediately to the south of SouthTmst Bank, between Church Street and <br />McCachem Street, extending south to the existing one-story commercial buildings at Church Street. <br />• Si[e 3 -the surface parking lot locared between Barbrick Avenue and Corban Avenue, extending Erom Spring Street to the <br />rear service area of the commercial buildings facing Union Street and the existing wurthouse. <br />• Site 4-the parking lot at the inrersec[ion of Corban Avenue and Church Street. This site was originally limited to property <br />currendy owned by the county, but was expanded during the course of this study to include the acquisition of additional <br />property extending to the intersection of Corban Avenue and Union Street. <br />Many of the qualities of these sires arc aesthetiq architectural, or civic in nature and do not necessarily present a quantifiable advan[age, <br />in terms of immediate economic jmpact, over [hose of other sites. 1'he sites currendy lack a defined street edge and allow surface <br />parking ro occupy land chat couhl be devoted to govemmenc/business use, or to more dense parking with some retail or commercial <br />component ac street level. Mach'of the downtown area outside of the main section of Unimr Street between Cabarets Avenue and <br />Corban Avenue lacks a strong street edge or urban character and is characterized by alternating street front buildings and surface parking <br />lots, which brrak dte rhythm oEtradicional downtown development. Occupation of any of the sites would provide the County with an <br />opportunity ro strengthen the urban fabric of downtown Concord. <br />To address the more objective characteristics of each site, a yualitacive scoring system was developed, which :usigned a value to dre <br />following criteria: <br />1) Proximity to existing courthouse/ability co interact with existing facility <br />2) Land area far immediate developmen[ <br />3) An:cssibility <br />4) Topography <br />5) Vegetation <br />6) Potential acquisition cost (speculative at this time) <br />7) Potential development case <br />8) Expandability <br />9) Need for additional property and amount required <br />10) Zoning <br />11) Parking availability <br />Sites 1, ?, and 3 immediaeely presented significant concerns because of their limited area; none of the [hree could accommodate jail <br />constmccion and reynired staff parking, making the acquisition of additional property an immediate requitement. Sire 4 presented the <br />only feasible opportunity to locate jail construction and parking on the same county-owned site. The proposed expansion of Site 4 to <br />include property extending to Lipion Street South presented the best opportmtiry for long-term planning of jail and courts expansion. <br />In addition m meeting the immediate and haute physical needs for the jail and courn, Si[e 4 presented the opportunity to create both a <br />strong county government campus at the eas[ corner of downtown Concord, tying the County Government Center on Church Sweet <br />more directly to Union S[ceet aad the coordsouse. Demolition of the current Sheriffs Department parking lot, once jail functions ore <br />relocated, strengthens this connection and could also provide a public green space at the center of downmwq reinforcing the traditional <br />concept of the courthouse squarC as the center of public activity. <br />April?fNW 2 ~` <br />G •'1 <br />