Laserfiche WebLink
March 27, 2004 Page 407 <br /> <br />Overview of Cabe=rus County Plennin~ Activities <br /> <br /> Mr. Marshall reported on the work that is being done in updating the <br />Northwest Area Plan, including the citizen-input process. He reviewed maps of <br />the area showing the municipal and County boundaries, zoning, residential <br />building permits (1990-2003), subdivision approvals (1980-2003) and approved <br />and planned subdivisions. <br /> <br />Overview of Concord Plannin~ Activities <br /> <br /> Mr. Young and Mr. Hiatt presented an overview of the current planning <br />activities in Concord. They reviewed the Draft Land Use Plan process for the <br />City and the development that is occurring in the Northwest ~rea. <br /> <br />Overview of Kann~polis Planninq Activities <br /> <br /> Mr. Mahaney, Mr. Legg and -Ms. Valdez discussed the current planning <br />challenges in the City of Kannapolis. They highlighted the following issues: <br />water line extensions planned in areas outside the city; lack of land use <br />control for areas outside the city; lack of annexation authority; and the <br />creation of two service areas for the City due to the location of Lake <br />Howell <br /> <br />Overview of Davidaon Pl&nnin~ Activities <br /> <br /> Mr. Brice and Mr. Krider presented a historical overview of development <br />in Davidson and the successes and failures of their evolving Land Use Plan. <br />Highlights of their presentation included the following: making the Town's <br />streets more friendly and pedestrian oriented, promoting connectivity and <br />utilizing mixed-use developments. <br /> <br />Overview of Huntersville Planning Activities <br /> <br /> Mr Cox and Mr. Slmoneau presented an overview of development and <br />planning related activities in Huntersville. Highlights of the discussion <br />included, traffic congestion, connectivity, design q~ality, and conformity <br />of development. Although the Town put a moratorium in place in 2002 for the <br />rewrite of the zoning/subdivision ordinance, Mr. Cox pointed out the <br />moratorium did not halt development due to the number of projects already in <br />the pipeline. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br /> <br /> Kannapolls resident Harold W. Smith opposed the developmen~ plans for <br />the City of Kannapolis, stating a large number of northwest area residents do <br />not want to be annexed and Kannapolls residents do not want to pay for the <br />City to build infrastructure in the northwest area. He said in his opinion <br />the County should take responsibility for developing water and sewer in =he <br />entire county and urged elected officials to listen to the citizens. <br /> <br />Review of Visual Preference Survey <br /> <br /> Mr McCoy presented a brief review of the Visual Preference Survey <br />results. The results of this survey were very similar to past surveys and <br />revealed that this group preferred quality development while maintaining and <br />preserving rural, hometown characteristics and open space. <br /> <br />Discussion by Elected Officials of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County <br />Regarding Sustainable ~rowth in Northwest Cabarrus County <br /> <br /> Mr. McCoy facilitated a discussion of the elected officials from <br />Cabarrus County, the City of Concord and the City of Kannapolis regarding the <br />following questions. (1) What is the vision for the development of Northwest <br />Cabarrus County? (2) What are the important elements in this new vision? and <br />(3) How can you make that vision a reality? Highlights of the discussion <br />included the following: growth in the northwest area; impact of residential <br />development; desire for quality development; conservation easements as tools; <br />preservation of farms/open spaces; the difference in development standards in <br />the County and the two municipalities, and the need for coordination between <br />jurisdictions. Important elements for the development of the area included <br />the following: farmland/open space preservation; clustering of housing; <br />connectivity; need to coordinate and work with surrounding communities; <br />management of the pace of growth so schools, water/sewer, etc., can keep up; <br />and existing county and city ordinances do not allow the preferred type of <br />development. <br /> <br /> <br />