Laserfiche WebLink
Court Counseling Staff Program Survey <br /> 3/7/03 Summary <br />County: Cabarrus ~ District: 19A <br /> <br />Name of Service/Program: CPI~ - Testinq & Referral Date: 3/7/03 <br /> ! <br />1. Juveniles referred to the pro~lram (from 11/1/02 to current date) 7 <br />2. Juveniles referred and admit!ed to program (from 11/1/02 to current date) 6 <br />3. Juveniles successfully completing program (from 11/1/02 to current date) 4 <br /> <br />For Questions 4 through 9, please rank (by circling) the appropriate number for the following areas: <br />Ranking Rates: 1 = Poor, 2 = Fall, 3 = Good, 4 = Very Good, 5 = Excellent <br /> Poor ~/ Excellent <br /> <br />4. Level of satisfaction with ser rices provided. <br /> <br />5. Level of satisfaction with ov{ ~'all services available <br /> <br />6. Juvenile's and family's satisf ~ction with services. <br /> <br />7. Ease of access to services. <br /> <br />8. Services are provided in a tir iely manner. <br /> <br />9. Communication level betwee~ program and counselor <br /> <br />4.75 <br /> 5 <br />4.75 <br />4.75 <br /> 5 <br /> 5 <br /> <br />10. Quality of services provided <br /> <br />11. Are there any obstacles for <br /> <br />12. What benefits does the pro~ <br />family to receive these services <br />program coordinator. Good enl <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />he court counselor, juvenile or family to receive services? a) None <br /> <br />fram provide that would encourage the court counselor, juvenile and <br /> a) Easy access of services, good communication and feedback from <br />~way to other possible services; b) mental health professional on site. <br /> <br />13. How could the services be i~lproved? Other services that could be provided? a) No problems; b) <br />none at this time; <br /> <br />14. Other comments: a) None <br /> <br /> <br />