Laserfiche WebLink
October 27, 2003 <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />278 <br /> <br />0.00 4.99 4.99 0 0.00% <br />5.00 5.39 0.39 I 0.50% <br />5.40 5.79 0.39 2 1.00% <br />5.80 6.19 0.39 3 1.50% <br />6.20 6.59 '0.39 4 2.00% <br />6.60 6.99 0.39 5 2.50% <br />7.00 7.39 0.39 6 3.00% <br />7.40 7.79 ~0.39 7 3.50% <br />7.80 8.19 0.39 8 4.00% <br />8.20 8.59 0.39 9 4.80% <br />8,60 9.00 0.40 10 5.00% <br /> <br />(NOTE: Merlt in=teases for County employees are scheduled to resume July 1, <br />2004.) <br /> <br /> Mr. Cummings reviewed a proposed amendment to the Personnel Ordinance <br />to allow accrued sick leave above 20 day~ from other governmental entities to <br />be credited the final pay period with Cabarrus County. <br /> <br /> U~ON ~OTION of Commissioner Ca=ruth, seconded by Commissioner Privette <br />and unanimously carried, the Board amended the Cabarrus County Personnel <br />Ordinance (Article VI, Section 18) effective immediately as set forth below <br />and added that sick leave accrual cannot be used to add to the years of <br />service to qualify for health insurance benefits. <br /> <br />Article VI. Leaves of Absence <br />Section 18. Sick Leave - Credit for Accumulation from Previous <br />Employment <br /> <br />Employees hired after the effective date of this Ordinance and <br />previously employed by a governmemtal entity in North Carollna <br />will receive credit with Cabarrus 'County for up to 20 days sick <br />leave accrued at that entity. Accrued sack leave over 20 days <br />will be credited the pay period of separation from County <br />employment. The employee must have been employed by the <br />governmental entity l~m~edlately prior {within the last 30 days) <br />to County Employment and that entity must document the accrued <br />sick leave amount and that the employee was not reimbursed for <br />any portion of ~he reported leave. <br /> <br />Personnel Ore~nmx~e va. Personnel Reaolu~ion <br /> <br /> At Mr. Day's request, Mr. Hartsel[ brLefly reviewed issues associated <br />with s Personnel Ordinance versus a Personnel Resolution. Ne addressed such <br />issues as the creation of a contract, due process and property rights. <br /> <br /> Information will be prepared outlining the advantages to an ordinance <br />versus a resolution along with a survey to determine if other counties have <br />ordinances or policies. <br /> <br />De'~0,ut~Clerk Poa~2ion <br /> <br /> Mr. Day presented the proposal to add a ~Deputy Clerk' pos~t~on to <br />provide support to the Clerk to the Board and to prepare for the future. <br /> <br /> There was discussion raga=ding the proposed position, including the <br />employment status of the position and the process for filling the position. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTI~ of Commissioner Prlvette, seconded by Commissioner <br />Carpenter and unanimously carried, the Board approved the establishment of a <br />Deputy Clerk position at Salary Grade 65 with a minimum salary of $28,706.29. <br /> <br /> Information is to be obtained from other Jurisdictions regardin~ Clerk <br />and Deputy Clerk positions, specifically if those positions are exempt from <br />the Personnel Ordinance/Policy. <br /> <br /> During discusslon~ Chairman Freeman proposed that all pos~t~ons be <br />subject to a one-year probationary period. Mr. Cummings explained the <br />current six-month probationary period that can be extended for a period of <br />three months. I~ was agreed this issue would be discussed further at a later <br />date. <br /> <br /> <br />