My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2002 11 18 (Regular)
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2002
>
AG 2002 11 18 (Regular)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2006 5:01:56 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:44:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
11/18/2002
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 21, ~' ~ '~k '"" 467 <br /> <br /> Mr. Hartsell explained the proposed adequate public facilities <br />ordinance is more detailed than the current ordinance and would be more <br />instructive to the development community and staff in making determinations <br />regarding the adequac~ of such facilities as schools, roads and water and <br />sewer. However, he pointed out the current ordinance had been approved by a <br />court of appeals. <br /> <br /> At 9:58 p.m., Chairman Freeman opened the public hearing on the <br />proposed Amendment (Adequate Public Facility Standards) to the Zoning <br />Ordinance. The Public Hearing Notice had been published in THE INDEPENDENT <br />TRIBUNE on October 11 and October 20, 2002. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ric Starnes, former member of the Cabarrus County Planning and <br />Zoning Commission, spoke in support of the proposed adequate public <br />facilities standards. He stated the standards are the only tools that are <br />available for con~rolling growth in the county. <br /> <br /> Mr. James Scarbrough stated to his knowledge the building industry has <br />not had the opportunity to review the proposed adequate public facilities <br />ordinance and provide input regarding those standards. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lentz advised that the proposed standards are the same as had been <br />drafted for the Unified Development Ordinance (UD0). He stated the building <br />industry had been very involved in the drafting of that article of the UDO. <br /> <br /> There was no one else present to address the Board, and Chairman' <br />Freeman closed the public hearing at 10:05 p.m. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Suggs, seconded by Vice Chairman Carruth <br />and unanimously carried, the Board deferred consideration of the proposed <br />adequate public facility standards until a future retreat of the Board. <br /> <br /> (F-3) Proposed Non-Emergency Transport Service Franchise Agreement with Mid- <br />State Transport Public Hearing - 6:30 p.m. for as soon ~hereafter as <br />persons ma~ be heard) <br /> <br /> Mr. Mike Downs, Public Safety Services Director, reviewed recent <br />activities associated with non-emergency transport services in the County. <br />The County received notice in August that Harrisburg Fire and Rescue would be <br />terminating service on September 30=h due to the lack of revenue. In order to <br />continue to provide service, Harrisburg Fire had requested that the County <br />respond to certain conditions, including a $90.00 subsidy for each call. At <br />the September 16=h meeting, the Board had authorized the County Manager and <br />County Attorney =o move forward with a contract with Mid-State Transport to <br />provide non-emergency transports on a per call basis with the County to <br />provide billing and administration. Staff had proceeded with the developmenu <br />of that contract and with the requirements for granting a non-emergency <br />ambulance franchise to Mid-State. He asked the Board to conduct the required <br />public hearing a= this time and consider the proposed Franchise Agreement <br />along with an interim agreement with Mid-State. Also, Mr. Downs reported <br />that Harrisburg Fire and Rescue submitted a proposal on October 18 to enter <br />into a con=tact similar to the one proposed with Mid-State for non-emergency <br />transports. <br /> <br /> Mr. Clifton explained the County had pursued other alternatives after <br />receiving the notice that Harrisburg Fire and Rescue planned to terminate <br />service on September 30. He stated that the County EMS has been providing <br />the non-emergency transports since October I and requested that the County <br />enter into the interim agreement with Mid-State Transport until the franchise <br />procedures can be completed. <br /> <br /> At 10:12 p.m., Chairman Freeman opened the public hearing on the <br />application from Mid-State Transport for a franchise to operate a non- <br />emergency ambulance service ~n Cabarrus County. The Public Hearing Notice <br />was published in THE CHARLOTTE OBSERVER (Cabarrus Neighbors) on October 6 and <br />13, 2002. The documents and exhibits associated with the franchise <br />application were included as a part of the Agenda. <br /> <br /> Ms. Carolyn Carpenter spoke in support of a contract with Harrisburg <br />Fire and Rescue to provide non-emergency transports. She cited their <br />experience in emergency care, knowledge of the area, ability to provide EMT- <br />Intermediate level of service and proposed cost of $103.00 per call as <br />compared to $105.00 per call by Mid-State. In conclusion, she presented a <br />letter from Cindy Watson from Eden Gardens commending Harrisburg Fire and <br />Rescue on the service they provide to that facility. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.