Laserfiche WebLink
· HDR to RV and RC: Two higher density districts are offered in the UDO <br /> while the current regulations offer one. For single family development the <br /> lot sizes are 7,500 and 5,000 square feet respectively vs. 6,000 square <br /> feet in the current ordinance. Maximum densities for multi- family <br /> developments are 8 and 15 units per acre respectively vs. 18 units per <br /> acre in the current ordinance. The--front setback in the UDO is more <br /> restrictive' than current standards (35"and 30 vs. 20) while the side and <br /> rear setbacks are less restrictive in the UDO. <br />· CC district: There is no equivalent in the current ordinance. The CC <br /> district is designed for the downtowns of Concord, Kannapolis, and Mount <br /> Pleasant. <br />· LC to B-land O-I: Two Iow intensity commercial and office districts are <br /> used in the UDO while the current regulations offer only one district. O-I <br /> is designed for office uses with some other commercial services while the <br /> B-1 is designed for office and neighborhood scale businesses or smaller <br /> shopping centers (up to 25,000 square feet). Setbacks are less restrictive <br /> in the UDO. <br />· GC to C-! and C-2: Two higher intensity commercial districts are offered <br /> compared to one district in the current ordinance. The C-1 district is <br /> similar to the B-1 district in regards to limitations on sizes of shopping <br /> centers however 'it offers more uses permitted by right than the B-1 <br /> district. The C-2 district is designed for larger shopping centers and <br /> superstores as well as wholesale distribution operations. Setbacks are less <br /> restrictive in the UDO. <br />· CD district: There is no equivalent in the current ordinance. The CD <br />district is designed for planned office and business parks. <br />· L/and G! to T-:L and ~[-2: virtually the same. Setbacks are less restrictive <br /> in the UDO. Impervious sUrface coverage for L[ and G! are 70 and 60 <br /> percent respectively while in the I-:[ and I-2 it is 80 and 90 percent <br /> respectively. <br />Cluster development options (4.8) will continue to be offered as a VOluntary <br />option in the UDO as they are in the current ordinance (except for mandatory <br />clustering in the CR district). Unlike the current cluster option a minimum lot <br />'size is prescribed and is based on the percentage of open space dedicated. A <br />minimum of 20 percent of the total tract must be set aside as open space <br />before the cluster option can be used. Lot sizes and setbacks can be reduced <br />up to 50 percent when 40 percent of the tract is protected as permanent <br />open space. As with current standards a perimeter buffer is required for <br />cluster developments. <br />A Traditional Neighborhood Development, a Planned Unit Development, and a <br />Transit Oriented Development district are offered in the UDO but are not <br />available in the current regulations. They are voluntary options that give the <br />developer more flexibility and more options for mixing different land uses in a <br />single development. <br /> <br /> <br />