Laserfiche WebLink
floating zones and overlay districts, and provides a few more base zoning <br />districts than provided in the current zoning regulations. <br /> <br />One of the biggest differences is how manufactured homes are permitted <br />(see 4.17). The current ordinance permits them by special standards or <br />conditional use permit in certain districts (-AO, CR, LDR, HDR, GC, and LI). Tn <br />the UDO, manufactured homes are regul~ited through the use of an overlay <br />district (IVlHOD). This allows more flexibility in regulating manufactured <br />homes in the county. For example, all HDR districts in the County permit <br />mobile home parks unless that use is excluded through a special use <br />rezoning. In the UDO, the base zoning district would need to have the MHOD <br />designation in order for a mobile home park to be permitted. By using the <br />overlay to regulate manufactured housing, more flexibility is gained because <br />any base zoning district could potentially allow manufactured housing if a <br />property owner were to request the MHOD designation. <br />The use charts are similar in the way they divide different land uses into <br />categories for easy reference (i.e. listings for industrial uses, residential uses, <br />etc.). The UDO offers a more comprehensive list of uses and ties each uses <br />to the Standard ]:ndustrial Classification code or S]:C code which is a nationally <br />recognized standard for defining different types of uses. This should offer <br />more clarity when classifying land uses during the permitting process. <br />Comparison of districts: <br />· AO, CR, and LDR to AG and RE: The UDO offers two Iow density districts <br /> vs. three in the current ordinance. The minimum lot size is one acre in all <br /> districts. The AG is most like the AO in that it is designed to <br /> accommodate agricultural uses. The RE is designed as a Iow density <br /> residential district and replaces the CR and LDR districts. Setbacks in the <br /> AO and AG are identical. ]:nstead of a 50 foot front setback in the RE a 45 <br /> foot setback is permitted with the side and rear setbacks the same as the <br /> CR district. While the CR district required clustering when developing 6or <br /> more lots the RE does not. This will be handled on a voluntary basis <br /> through the clustering standards in 4.8. <br />· MDR to RL, RM-1, and RM-2: The UDO offers three medium density <br /> districts while the current ordinance offers only one district. Host <br /> residential development in the County occurs in the MDR district. To offer <br /> greater flexibility there will be three districts offered in the UDO. While <br /> the MDR district permits 10,000 square foot lots as a minimum lot size the <br /> RL, RM-1, and RH-2 offer 20,000, 15,000, and 10,000 (or approx, half <br /> acre, third of an acre, and quarter acre) square foot minimum lot sizes <br /> respectively. This offers a greater variety of sizes between the current <br /> ordinances one acre and quarter acre choices. In general, setbacks are <br /> slightly less restrictive in the UDO (i.e. front is 25 vs. 30 in the current <br /> ordinance). <br /> <br /> <br />