Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br /> <br /> 1, As a symbol of an earlier reform effort of juvenile justice, we believe this part of <br /> the campus should be preserved for posterity. <br />2. In addition, hi.qtoric based renovation and preservation of this property would <br /> vastly improve the overall appearance of the Stonewall Jackson Property. As a <br /> result, the overall image that the community has of the school, its processes and <br /> services would improve. <br />3. Sale of the property to a private developer would put -the property back on the <br /> local tax rolls. Businesses operating here would provide a pool of state income <br /> tax payers. <br />4. If not this offer, what7 After two years of diligent marketing work, this was the <br /> only offer received. From a practical perspective, if the buildings are left in their <br /> current state of disrepair, the state will sooner or later need to allocate substantial <br /> mounts ofdemnlition monies. By current estimales, it would cost far more than <br /> $200,000.00 to remove the buildings. <br /> <br /> Thank you for your consideration of our recommendations regarding this matter. <br />Please advise if you have questions or need further infmmation. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />WesleSgB. Seamon <br /> <br />Chairman, Stonewall Jackson Community Advisory Council <br /> <br />C: Mr. Charles Newton, Director, Stonewall Jackson Youth Academy Mr. Murray F. Gould, Gould associates <br /> Ms. Amy Cole, PreservatiOn North Carolina <br /> <br /> <br />