Laserfiche WebLink
17 <br /> <br />Cabals Con~ty ~ad Emma~olis C~.'~- <br /> <br />~he ~a~' ~-Yea~ Fac~l~y P~ for ~e C~ Sch~ls. Re e~has~zed <br />2he Fac~l~ Pl~ ~s a c~g~n~ do~en~ ~ needs ~o be updated each ~ear. <br />D~. W~ler reviewed pro~ec~ed schoo~ e~llmen~s, a ~arly co~ison <br />schoo~ ~lmen~ ~ capac~h~ ~d locakion o~ pro~ec~ed ne~ ~d replace~t <br />schools w~n h~h-9~o~h ~eas. He s~a~ed 2hat efforts should be~in no~ <br />~oca~e s~es [o~ ~u~e elem~a~ schools ~n 2he ~ Roc~ River Road <br />P~ts Schoo~ Road ~eas. ~the~ p~posed ne~ schools included ~ep~ace~s ~o~ <br />0~11 Ele~a~ ~ Be~he~ Elem~a~, new elemen~ schools ~n 2he <br /> <br />o~ the co~ ~d a new h~h school ~ ~e s~he~ pa~ of C~ar~s <br />~so p~posed ~s a voca~io~l ~ec~ical school =o be ~112 in <br />wi~ =he Row~ C~s C~i=y College. ~. Wi~er also ~tlined capital <br /> <br />C~cord Hi~h, ColOr,e-watt Blemen=a~ addit~on, re~lacem~= of Long C~er <br />~d re~eling of =he Gle~ Cen~er. ~. Robe~ ~u=~z, four ~anspo~ation <br />Director for ~he Co~ty Schools, assisted Dr. Wt~er with ~he presentation. <br /> <br />Education, a~essed ~he issu~ of re~atrictin9 ~d s~ool rapacity needs. <br /> <br /> ~. Clifton proposed ~t ~ architect ~e emplo~d to do a thoroush <br />~alysis off the ~stin9 Bethel ~ Odell Elementa~ Schools, alo~ wi~h the <br />old Aycock School in e~--apolis, to demesne the feasibility ~d <br /> <br />poss~ly be renovated ~d used as s~ller sch~ls for a period o~ time, thus <br />adding capacity in those areas. <br /> <br /> Dr. Winkler commented on the high cost of renovating older school <br />facilities and described his ex~erience with school renovations in Florida. <br /> <br /> The Board by consensus authorized Mr. Clifton to pursue an architect's <br />review of the Ode11, Bethel and Aycock school facilities for potential future <br /> <br /> The Board received the Five Year State Facilities Plan for ~nnapolis <br />City Schools along with Kaenapolis City Schools Facilities Task Force Report. <br />The Task Force reco~aended a new ~u[ddle school, additions at Fred L. Wilson <br />and Shady Brook Blemehtar~ Schools ~a co~letion Of ~ ~nished science <br />win~ a~ A. L. B~ ~h Sch~l. ~e =oral cost for the projects was <br />estimated at approx~=el~ $22 million. <br /> <br /> Mr. Clifton recommended that the new middle school, if needed, be built <br />in Rowan County with Rowan cOUnty to par~icipate in the funding. A meeting <br />has been soheduled with Rowan' County mn~ Kannapolts City School officials to <br />discuss the requested new middle school. <br /> <br />~f~ed Devel~ant Ordinance <br /> <br /> The follow~n~ persons Jot~ed the Board for a discussion of the proposed <br />Unified Development Ordinance (~DO): Mr. ~eth Pa~e~ Ms. Dabble Bro~ with <br />=he Real Estate ~d B~ldi~ Indust~ CoaliUion (~IC)~ ~. Mike ~[ckel, <br />President of the C~a~s Cowry Buildin~ Indust~ ~socia~ion~ ~d ~. David <br />Mayf~eld, C~i~ o~ the ~0 Steering ~i~=ee. <br /> <br /> Mr. Quickel stated that the Building Industry is opposed to the <br />Adequate Public Facilities (A~F) requirements for water, sewer, roads and <br />schools a~d asked that Article 14 be deleted from the proposed UDO. He <br />stated that sewer is the only measurable item relative to the adequate public <br />facilities requirements. <br /> <br /> Mr. Marshall explained there is a question as to how cities oan enforce <br />APF requirements for a service, such as schools, that they do not provide. To <br />address this Concern, the consultant has been asked to develop a process to <br />address the ~asurement of soh~ol adequacy issues. <br /> <br /> Ms. Brown also opposed the APF requirements, stating the County could <br />not properly administer the APF requlations without a useable Comprehensive <br />Plan. She expressed concern that the APF. requirements could become a <br />moratorium to stop growth in the county i~ Cubarrus County does not properly <br /> <br /> <br />