AG 2001 03 26 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the UDO Steering Committee an~ the municipalities finalize all changes to the UDO prior to the Board voting cn the proposed ordinance. The Board took no action concerning Commissioner Privette's proposal. Mr. Marshall and Ms. Kelly Sifford, senior Planner, reviewed the items listed on the 'UDO Master List of Recommended Changes (After Sept. 15, 2000)" and responded to questions by the Board shout specific issues on the list. This list included recommended changes for all versions of ~he UDO along with recommended changes for the F,-~apolis, Concord and Cabarrus County versions. Also, the list highlighted the key items and recommended changes to be discussed by the Steering Committee. Issues d/scussed by the Board included the role of the Zoning A~nistrator, sldewalks, neigh~orhood meetings, density of the Agriculture (Ag) District, home occupations, cond/tional use rezcning, si~n regulations, location of churches, coonectivity ratio, etc. ~PON MDTIO~ of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Chairman Fennel and unanimously carried, the Board deferred action on the proposed Unified Development Ordinance until the n~x~ meeting on March 19, 2001, with recommendations from the Steering Committee --~ the Town of Harrisburg at that time. · mendmen~ to Noise Ordinance Re~ulat~n~ Fixewo=kl Displays - Public Neax~n~ ~ At 8=2~ P.M., ~ai~n Fete1 opened =he p~llc hearing on ~e proposed revision to the C~ar~8 Co~ty Noise Ordin~e (~ticle II, ~apter 30 of the Code of Ordin~ces) to re, late the time of ~y ~at fireworks displays are held. ~e Notice of the ~lic Hearin~ was p~lishea in 'f~ ~IB~ ~d ~ ~ OBSER~R (C~ar~s Neig~ors) on F~a~ 8, 2001. There was no present =o ad,ess the Board, and ~ai~ F~el closad the p~lic hearing. Chai~ ~e~el ~de a motion, seconded ~ Vice Chai~ Car~=h, to adopt the revised Noise Ord~n~ce to include a provisi~ to prohibit the display og fir~rks after 9:00 ~.m. on S~day ~hrough ~ursday. ~d after 11300 p.m. on Friday ~d Saturday, with an ~ception for ~ew Year's ~e, when fireworks ~y be displayed until 12:~S a.m. on New Year's Day. Mr. Joe Schlatter, reporter with ~ ~EP~ ~IB~, ~est~onad the dlsplay of fire~rks on the Fourth of July. ~ON ~ ~TION of ~ai~an Fe~el, seconded by Co~issioner Prtvet~e ~d ~anl~asly carried, ~e Board agreed =o amend =he Noise. Ordinance prohibit the display of fire~rks after 9:00 p.m. on S~y t~ou~h Thursday ~d agter 11:00 p.m. on Friday ~ Sa=ur~y, with ~ exception for New Year's ~e, wh~ fire~rks ~y be displayed ~til 12:4~ a.m. on New Ye~'s Day and for ~ excep=!o~ to pe~ f~re~rks ~o be ~splayed ~=il 11:00 p.m. on the · o~h of ~ly. '~e revised Noise Ordinance (~t~=le ii, ~apter 30 of the Code of O~nan=~s) as adopted by =he Board is as follows: Ordinate No. 2001-01 BE IT O~Ai~ ~t ~ticle II; ~apter 30 of the C~ar~s Cowry North Carolina Code of 0rd~--~ces is a~ded to reed as follows: ~TI~E II. NOISE Sec. 30-26. Penalty for v~olatton of ~y person violating t~ pr~sions of this ~ti=le shall ~ ~llty of a misdeme~or' ~, upon conviction, shall be p~ished in accordanc~ section 1-?. (Ord. of 6-~82, ~ 23 Sec. 30-27. ~umeration of prohibited ac~s. (a) S~Ject to the provisions of =his article, the creation of u~easo~le loud, disturbin~ ~d ~eoessa~ noise of such ~arac=er as ~uld be a ~triment to p~lic health, co~or~,' safety, welfare and prosperity of the residents of the cowry is prohibited.