My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2000 04 17
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2000
>
AG 2000 04 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 4:57:12 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:47:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
4/17/2000
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> Mr. Clifton responded to questions regarding the value of the <br />developer's offer to address school adequacy issues. The developer has <br />offered a cash contribution of $350,000.00 to offset adequacy to schools, <br />grading and site preparation by the company of the two school sites at a <br />value of $300,000.00, and engineering, survey and planning costs of <br />$50,000.00. The County proposes to exchange the existing Odell School <br />property (approximately 17 acres) for approximately 62 acres of property and <br />to acquire an additional 19 acres to have sufficient property for two school <br />sites. The developer has estimated the current value of land to be provided <br />to the school system in the exchange at $865,700.00. Mr. Clifton stated a <br />value had not been determined for the Odell School property. However, the <br />developer would not acquire the property until August 2005 and would accept <br />it in "as is" condition at that time, assuming responsibility for demolition, <br />asbestos removal, etc. <br /> <br /> Mr. Marshall responded to a number of questions regarding the capacity <br />of Odell School, number of projected students from the new development, <br />financial implications of the project, the Western Area Plan and flood plain <br />regulations. Ee stated capacity at the existing school is 640 and that the <br />projected student count from the development is 1,002 based on .6 per <br />dwelling unit. According to Mr. Marshall, a property tax value of <br />approximately $175,000.00 per home is necessary for the County to break even <br />on providing school services. The developer has indicated that the tax value <br />of homes in the new project would exceed that amount. Also, he stated the <br />proposed development does fit within proposed density of areas in which <br />public service is to be provided and the mixed used component fits within the <br />planned goals for the Western Area Plan. Finally, Mr. Marshall indicated <br />there is ample area for the location of two schools on the designated <br />property even though approximately 25 to 30 percent of the property is in the <br />flood plain. <br /> <br /> Mr. Robert Burkett, Petitioner, gave an overview of his past experience <br />as a developer, stating he has been in the development and construction <br />business for close to 40 years and has had considerable exPerience over the <br />last 20 years in residential, commercial and land development activities. He <br />has developed two similar mixed-use projects in the Cary area as well as some <br />mixed-use projects in Virginia and New Jersey. He is currently working on the <br />Rocky River Crossing project in the Town of Harrisburg. Mr. Burkett gave an <br />overview of the proposed project, Moss Farms Development, and stated plans to <br />create a place where people can live, work and play in one area. He stated <br />the project would take a minimum of six years to build out and will include <br />residential space, commercial/retail space and general office space. Both <br />active and passive recreational opportunities will be constructed. <br />According to Mr. Burkett, the mixed-used development will keep a large <br />portion of the traffic on site and mitigate some of the traffic on the <br />outside roads. He valued the current Odell School property at approximately <br />$47,000.00 per acre in today's dollars. However, he stated he will not take <br />possession of the property until August 2005 with estimated demolition and <br />clean up costs of $1.2 million. Mr. Burkett also pointed out that only <br />perhaps 50 percent of the projected 1,002 students will attend elementary <br />school with the others to attend middle or high school. <br /> <br /> Mr. Stephen Stansbery, Senior Transportation Planner for the Greensboro <br />office of Kubilins Transportation Group, presented the findings of a traffic <br />impact analysis for the proposed development. He reviewed the Executive <br />Sugary and presented an overview of the methodology used in conducting the <br />traffic impact analysis of existing conditions and of existing and future <br />zoning for the Year 2004, assuming full build out of the project. The <br />roadways in the study area were NC 73, Odell School Road and Harris Road. <br />The intersections in the study area included: Odell School Road/NC 73; Odell <br />School Road/Harris Road; Site Access "A"/NC 73; Odell School Road/Site Access <br />~B~'; and Site Access ~C"/Harris Road. Mr. Stansbery stated the results of the <br />2004 existing and proposed zoning analyses showed that improvements would be <br />required to provide acceptable intersection operations. Also, NC 73 will need <br />to be widened to the recommended five-lane urban section. Turn lanes and <br />signal phases will need to be added to achieve adequate traffic operations at <br />the Odell School Road/NC 73 intersection. In addition, traffic signals and <br />turn lanes would be required at the other four intersections to achieve <br />adequate traffic operations for the proposed zoning. Mr. Stansbery <br />recommended that consideration be given to developer participation of the <br />following improvements: <br /> · Construct the three new site access intersections with traffic <br /> signals and appropriate turn lanes. The installation of these <br /> signals is recommended upon meeting applicable traffic signal <br /> warrants as outlined in the MUTCD and upon approval by the North <br /> Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.