Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes <br />May :[8, 2000 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />Page 22 <br /> <br />exist. The problem exist with the middle school. Mr. Mervin said the County <br />Commissioners are currently working on those school sites. He said it is his <br />understanding, at least the papers indicated today, that the County <br />Commissioners just last flight approved funding for two middle schools. He said <br />as best he understand it that somewhat fills in the void in this process of <br />adequate facilities. Mr. Mervin said the suggestion was made by the planning <br />staff that the number of building permits be limited to 10 a year. <br /> <br />Mr. Moose asked the Chair why the Board do not have that information on this <br />adequate facilities school capacity in this particular package. <br /> <br />Mr. Hobbs said it is in the letter. <br /> <br />The Chair said it does not give the projections or capacities when it is going to <br />come on line versus when this would come on line. <br /> <br />Mr. Hobbs said the letter reads, "the high school would not be a problem on <br />August of 200:[ when the new one is olYen. The middle school is a problem until <br />they fund and build a new one. :it is capped. Bethel school is at capacity until <br />the new one is built. :it is capped." <br /> <br />Mr. Dwiggins said to the Chair until the Board gets some clearer guidelines from <br />the Commissioners, he said he does not see how the Board can get around the <br />adequate facilities ordinance. <br /> <br />The Chair said because of the size of it and the fact that they do have some <br />plans to get the capacity on-line, he said he would vote for a motion they the <br />Board approve this subject to the Commissioners final approval. <br /> <br />Ms. Kiker said in the letter from Mr. KluLlz where he says ":if this subdivision was <br />the only one to be considered in this part of the county over the next two years <br />we believe the students could be accommodated. However, there is no <br />assurance that this will be the only proposed subdivision for this area". She said <br />she do not see how the Board can say, because this is small, we will go ahead. <br /> <br />There being no further comments, Mr. Dwiggins MOTIONED to deny Petition <br />C00-02(S) based on its failure to meet the adequate public facilities ordinance, <br />seconded by Mr. Love. The vote was 7 to 2. Mr. Carl Hill and Mr. Ed Hill <br />dissenting. <br />Petition C00-02(S) Denied <br /> <br /> <br />