AG 2000 10 16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

532 Ordinance No. 2000-03 PETITION C00-01(ST) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CABARRUS COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS BE IT ORDAINED that the Cabarrus County Subdivision Regulations is hereby amendsd as follows= Section 66-40. Final plat requirements. B.12. Location of Floodplain/River-Stream Buffer Overlay - subdivider shall show location of one hundred (100) year flood elevation and location of buffer strip as required by the Eiver/S=ream Overlay. (Section 66-73 of the Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance). Adopted this the 18=~ day of September, 2000 by the Cabarrus County Board of Commissioners. /s/ Arnen. Fennel Arne L. Fennel, Chairman Board of Commissioners ATTEST= rs! Frankie F. Bonds Frankie F. Bonds, Clerk to the Board CABARRUS COUNT~CODR OF ORDINANCRS Chapter 66, Subdivision Regulations ~nified Development ordinance - ~lie Hearing - $~30 p.m. Chairman Fennel recognized Mr. Jonathan Marshall, Planning'Services Director, to make introductory comments concerning the proposed Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). Mr. Marshall presented an overview of the proposed UP0 and outlined the process that began in 1997 by the County and the local municipalities to develop the proposed ordinance. Mr. Marshall explained the purpose of the UDO is to unify all land development ordinances among the jurisdictions. However, he pointed out Chat the UDO would continue to he administered and reviewed individually by each of the Jurisdictions. Also, Mr. Marshall stated the existing zoning classification for all parcels would be changed to the most similar category under the UDO. Finally, he advised that staff would prepare a document that specifically references Cabarrus County and related General Statute citations. The model draft was prepared using the City of Concord as a model. Chairman Fennel announced those persons with questions about the current and proposed zoning classifications for their property should contact the Planning Services Department. Those persons owning property within the city limits of Concord or Kannapolis should call the planning department for the municipality in which their property is located. Mr. Marshall responded to a number of questions by Board members regarding recent changes to the draft UDO, the changes in zoning classifications, the public hearing process and the process for future amendments to the UDO and Zoning Maps. Also, at the Board's request, he addressed a number of items listed in an advertisement published in the local newspapers on September 17, 2000. ~ness included issues related to the following: non-conforming uses; sexually oriented businesses, including supplemental regulations, related constitutional rulings and court cases; dwelling ._units on agriculturally zoned land; the process for splitting off building lots; home businesses and the uss of detached buildings; animal units; the cutting of trees; bona fide farms; the use of cul de sacs and connectivity requirements; conditional uses; and landscaping requirements. At 7:36 p.m., Chairman Fennel opened the public hearing concerning the proposed b-DO and Zoning Maps. The Notice of the Public Hearing for the UDO and Zoning maps was published in THE INDEPENDENT TRIBUNE and THE CHARLOTTR OBSERVER (Cabarrus Neighbors) on August 27, September 3, September 10 and September 17, 2000. In addition to those advertisements, Mr. Marshall stated that mailings were sent on September 6, 2000 to those property owners who live outside the circulation area for the newspapers. Mr. John Morro, resident of 254 Central Heights Drive, Concord, asked the Board to postpone the final vote on the UDO until after further review.