Laserfiche WebLink
Article 6,4.11.4 As built drawings. <br /> · Consider limiting to water and sewer, or option for city to do it. <br /> <br />6.4.15 <br /> <br />Subdivision Agreement. When are meters supposed to be installed are they part of "required <br />improvements". <br />Need to have engineers answer this question. <br /> <br />How does 6.5.3.5 relate to Table 6.5-I? <br /> · Drop second sentence from Article 6.5.3.5 so that it matches the Table. <br /> <br />Explain 6.6.5.5 Old reference. · Remove 6.6.5.5. <br /> <br />Limits on flag pole portion of lots. <br /> · Only limited in RY and RC district. <br /> <br />Based on Article 14.2.3 who provides positive determination. <br /> · Need flow chart to indicate how process works. <br /> <br />Article 7.2.1 Landscape architect, certified nurseryman. Also issue about maintenance and replacement. · Review these two issues. <br /> <br />Article 8.4.1 Loading docks may not be visible from thoroughfare or collector street right-of-way. · Consider screening requirement tied to Article 7. <br /> · Change references in 8.1.2.5. <br /> <br />Permeable pavement shoUld be allowed. <br /> · Article 8.1'.2.5 allows alternative paving materials. Should consider permission to <br /> exceed maximum if it is too permeable. <br /> <br />Articles 10.1.5.2 conflicts with 10,1.5.8. <br /> · Consider change in 10.1.5.8 to add "may be designed to minimize block length. <br /> <br />Letters of credit not permitted except for final improvements. · Address model homes. <br /> <br />9F28/00 Bill Cochran <br /> <br />Traffic impact studies concerto (Appendix B) <br /> · Section has already been modified City/County will supply all information that they <br /> have available. <br /> · Threshold of 2000 trips/day or more (Article 14). Reconsider language to make sure <br /> that tl~e_shold is clear (pg. 14-3). Covered more specifically in 143.5.8. <br /> <br />What's required prior to APF approval. <br /> · Article 14 covers this, although some of the list is oulside of APF review. <br /> <br />Traffic section very confusing (Appendix B & C). <br /> · City of Concord has reviewed and will continue to review. <br /> <br />Need buffer return on calls from City of Concord. · No responses <br /> <br /> <br />