AG 2000 11 20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~PON ~OTION of Comm/ssioner Prfvet~e, seconded by Co~issfoner Casper and ~i~uel~ c~rie~, =he Board appr~ed ~he purchase of property located a= 1~0 South Loop ~ad, F~--apol~s, from Central Dis=ribu=ing Comply, Inc. a= a ~urchase price of $24~,000.00. ~r~her, =he Board authorized C~i~an =o si~ the ~reemen= for ~rc~se ~d Sale of Real Proper=y" Agreemen=" ~ng the Co~y, Cen=ral Distributin~ C~y, Inc., ~d Morg~ Real=ors wher~ =he Seller will pay =he. real esta=e co~ission. Nr. Jona=h~ Marshall, Plain9 Se~ices Direc=or, dis=ribu=ed a lis= of issues ~d/or rec~ended ch~e s conceding =he proposed Unified Developmen= Ordln~ca (~). ~. Rodger Len=z, Senior ~l~er, highlighted =he followlng issues for w~ch =here ~d been ~es=ions and/or conce~s. Section 1.6.4.1~ ~lows ~he adm~nistra=or =o wi=~old from ~ applican~ if ~ha= person has ou~s=anding repeat violations on ~he proJec~ in ~esCion or eno=her proJec= within C~a~s Co~=y. Staff feels ~his pr~ides a ve~ good incentive for ~he person involved to co~ec= repea= viola=ions to such provisions as erosion con=rol re~la=ions. ~ticle 3 Sec=ion 3.1.9.S= Neig~orh~d meetings are ~rking ve~ we~l ~polis ~ the City of Charlot=e. (~arlo=te was re,ired ~o add Chem to their process =hrough =heir speclal le~slatlon for rezonin~ procedures) . SCarf feels ~hat ~hase meetings will reduce conflic= at p~lic hearings ~d produce beC=er development ~roposals. Section 3.2.5.2.5: Perforce securi~ies shoula have par=ial releases. S=aff feels t~= ~his wou~d be a reason~le approach. OCher Jur~sdtctions have objec=ed =o this a~proach. Table 4.7-1: AG densi=ies are too low ~d ~y devalue ~is standard already ~uches the adop=e~ ~oli~ within =he Rimer ~erlay O-I, C-2. C-2 was ch~ged from 70% to 80% coverage. Sec=ion 6.3.~.2: ~e ~wo week =ime p~riod for final pla= review ~ appr~al will pe~= land records =ime =o digi=ize each new s~division so the= the addressin~, ~, a~ buildtn~ process c~ opera=e more efficiently ~d ac~ra~ely. ~e Board discussed each of =he issues presen=ed by Mr. Len=z. Board occupa~ion~ ~d ~ral home occupation. He ~lained ~ha= ho~ oc=upa~ions ~ake place wit~n ~he home and ~ral home occupations allow =he use of accesso~ building. He co~ared ~he various dis~rtc=s allowing home oc~pa~ions ~a ~al home occupations and reviewed ~he t~es peri=ted ~d =he general s=~dards for each. ~ter discussion, =he Board generally agree~ to =he following c~nges =o =he home occupa=ion ~rovisions= (1) pe~= pet shop/gr~ng (enclosed) ~d barber/beauty shop as home occupa=ions =o confo~ w~=h existfn~ r~la=io~ (2) clarify =he use of fla~le ~=erials in co,llanos =he ~ire Code~ (3) ex=end ~he t~me for visits, deliveries ~d pic~ps from 6:00 a.m. to 10=00 p.m.~ and (4) s=rike =he Drovision lim~=ing visits =o six clien=s/day. In a~t=ion, the Board ~ consensus agreed =o the following ch~ges relative ~o ~ral home occupa~ions: {1} ~d 9e~it=ed wi~h s~dards in =he following four ~s=ricts wi=h a ~ni~ io= size of =~ acres Residen=ial Medi~ Density (~1), Residen~al Medium Densi=y (~2), Rural Es~a=e Dis=riot (~) ~d Residential Low Density (~)~ (2) re,ye for 'ind~r only" from Building Con=rat=or S~orage Ya~/Office; (3) provision ll~=ing ou=door storage ~o 80 s~are fee~; (4) delete provision lt~=ing ou=door s=orage of s~acked ~=erial ~o 4 fee=; and (5) reduce