Laserfiche WebLink
298 <br /> <br /> There was brief discussion by the Board regarding the responsibility of <br />the proposed Construction Oversight Com~ittee and the process for the Board's <br />appointment of three meulbers to tke Committee. <br /> <br /> ~ON MOTION of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Commissioner Casper <br />and unanimously carried, the Board adopted the school construction process as <br />outlined with the change that the County Commission will ~'approve" rather <br />than "provide" funding. The approved process was as follows: <br /> <br />99-00 SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS: <br />TWO MIDDLE SCHOOLS AND ONE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL <br />PARTICIPATION PROVIDED BY: <br /> <br />COL~TY COMMISSION <br />1. ATTEND AArD PARTICIPATE AS ABLE: <br /> ... Meetings of the Joint Education Committee <br /> ... Visitations to selected school sites submitted by architect <br /> applicants <br /> .~. Review of architect finalist presentations <br /> .,. Participate in architect interviews <br /> ... Review of ~value engineering' presentations by H.R. Gray <br />2. APPROVE FUNDING FOR: <br /> ... H.R. Gray technical services (existing funds) <br /> ... School site acquisition (existing funds) <br /> ... Architectural services (existing funds) <br /> ... Construction (financed costs) <br />3. APPOINT THREE CITIZENS TO THE PROPOSED CITIZENS CONSTRUCTION OVERSIGHT <br /> COMMITTEE <br /> <br />BOARD OF EDUCATION <br />1. ATTEND /kND PARTICIPATE AS ABLE: <br /> ... Meetings of the Joint Education Committee <br /> ... Visitations to selected schools sites submitted by architect <br /> applicants <br /> ... Review of architect finalist presentations <br /> ... Review of 'value engineering' presentations by H,R. Gray <br />2. INTERVIEW ARCHITECTS SELECTED BY JOINT EDUCATION COMMITTEE <br />3, SELECT AND AWARD CONTP~kCT(S) TO ABCHITECT(S) <br />4. SELECT V~LLUE ENGINEERING ITEMS TO INCLUDE IN DESIGN <br />5. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRJkCTS <br />6. APPOINT THREE CITIZENS TO THE PROPOSED CITIZENS CONSTRUCTION OVERSIGHT <br /> COMMITTEE <br /> <br />JOINT EDUCATION COMMITTEE: <br />Membership: B.O.C. (Barnhart, Privette, & County Manager) <br /> B.O.E. (Lee, Williams, & School Superintendent) <br /> 1. PURSUE SELECTION OF ARCHITECT(S) ~/gD SCHOOL DESIGNS <br /> Architect(s) selection process tied to existing school projects <br /> built in recent years <br /> Consideration of how local 'interactive design options' can or can <br /> not be incorporated in designs submitted by architect <br /> applicants <br /> Choose which school sites to visit from those submitted by <br /> architect applicants as ~best' examples <br /> Review scheduling issues placing weight on ability of architect <br /> applicants to meet needs of county <br /> Consider issues of school design, size and site selection <br /> Take input from B.O.E., B.O.C., Citizens Oversight Committee and <br /> others <br />2. SELECT ARCHITECTS TO BE INTERVIEWED BY B.O.S. <br />3. REVIEW VALUE ENGINEERING FINDINGS <br />4. OTHER ISSUES AS MAY COME FORWARD <br /> <br />CITIZENS CONSTRUCTION OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE <br />Membership: three appointees by the B.O.E. <br /> three appointees by the B.O.C. <br />1. Participate in site visitations of 'best' examples submitted by architect <br /> applicants <br />2. Participate in design review evaluation inclusive of local 'interactive <br /> design options' <br />3. Participate in 'value engineering' review, providing recommendations <br />4. Provide input into 'future' building design and site selection <br /> considerations <br />5. Provide feedback to the B.O.E., B.O.C. and public as required during <br /> process <br />6. Provide a summary report of the process fdr reference in future projects <br /> <br /> <br />