My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1999 11 15
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1999
>
AG 1999 11 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 6:02:06 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:50:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
11/15/1999
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
326 <br /> <br /> There was brief discussion regarding the request to fund the Partnership <br />for Tomorrow initiative. The discussi6n centered oh such issues as the <br />existing Economic Development Corporation and possible duplication of tasks <br />as well as the County's ongoing efforts to fund the construction of new <br />schools. There was general consensus to defer consideration of this issue <br />until all Board members were present for the discussion. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Casper, seconded by Commissioner Privette <br />and unanimously carried, the Board tabled consideration of the request for <br />funding the Partnership for Tomorrow initiative until a more appropriate <br />time, possibly at the upcoming Retreat. <br /> <br />ADDeal of the Plannin~ and Zonin~ Commission's Denial of Petition C99-06(S) - <br />Request for Preliminaz-v Plat ADDroval of the Booe/Untz Development <br /> <br /> Mr. Brad Lagano, Senior Planner, presented Petition C99-06(S), an appeal <br />Of the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial of the request for preliminary <br />plat approval of the Booe/Untz Development in Township 3. The Planning and <br />Zoning Commission voted 9-0 on September 30, 1999 to deny the preliminary plat <br />for the following reason: <br /> <br />"The proposed development does not meet the adequate public <br />facilities provision of the Cabarrus County Subdivision Ordinance <br />(Section 66-81). Specifically, the Cabarrus County School <br />District does not have adequate facilities at this time to sez-~e <br />the estimated number of students who would be generated by the <br />proposed development." <br /> <br /> Mr. Alex Rankin, President of Concord Engineering, Inc. and speaking on <br />behalf of Petitioners Tom Booe and Joe Untz, presented information concerning <br />the proposed subdivision. The proposed project consists of 260 acres and <br />includes approximately 900 lots, up to 1,100 dwelling units, recreational areas <br />and an open area of 3.9 acres designated as a Town Center in the interior of <br />the project. Mr. Rankin reviewed the updated preliminary plat and highlighted <br />the changes that had been made since the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />meeting, included changes to some cul-de-sacs, the interior subdivision road <br />and the development of a third access to the project. Be explained the project <br />would represent "Smart Growth" and would consist of very dense development with <br />an estimated build out over a period of five to eight years. Finally, Mr. <br />Rankin stated the developers were prepared to contribute $250.00 per living <br />unit to address school facility adequacy needs. <br /> <br /> Mr. Joe Untz, developer, responded to specific questions by Board <br />members concerning the development. He addressed such issues as the cost of <br />utilities, use of open space and the development of greenways and other areas <br />for recreation purposes. Mr. Untz confirmed the offer to contribute $250.00 <br />per dwelling unit to meet school facility needs. Also, according to Mr. <br />Untz, the developers are spending approximately $850,000.00 to run a water <br />line to the project. He advised that the water line construction and the <br />contribution to school adequacy would represent costs of approximately <br />$1,300.00 per unit. <br /> <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Privette and seconded by Vice Chairman <br />Fennel to approve Petition C99-06(S) as modified contingent upon the execution <br />by the developer of a development agreement in form and content consistent with <br />agreements previously approved, specifically including a contribution of <br />$250.00 per dwelling unit to be used to address school .facility needs. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Casper offered an amendment to the motion to include a figure <br />of not less than $500.00 per dwelling unit as a contribution to school facility <br />needs. Commissioner Privette did not accept the amendment, and the proposed <br />amendment by Commissioner Casper died for a lack of a second. <br /> <br /> There was lengthy discussion by the Board regarding the proposed <br />development and the school needs in Cabarrus County. The discussion centered <br />on such issues as the cost of installing utilities to this development as well <br />as other new developments in the County, the contribution of $500.00 per <br />dwelling unit by other developers to address school facility needs, the <br />legality of impact fees and the provision in the County's Subdivision Ordinance <br />addressing "adequate public facilities" in Cabarrus County. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jonathan Marshall, Planning Services Director, responded to questions <br />by the Board regarding the cost of providing utilities to new developments. He <br />advised that each development has its own unique circumstances and costs. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.