My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1997 05 19
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1997
>
AG 1997 05 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 6:28:31 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:53:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
5/19/1997
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COVER <br />STORY <br /> <br /> The price of progress: <br /> -Infrastructure payment plans you can live with <br />- Relentless development and population growth continue to fuel the need <br /> for infrastructure improvements or additions. Since the old ways of raising <br />- revenue often do not cut it with taxpayers, local officials have adopted <br /> financing methods that target the principaI beneficiaries of improvements. <br /> <br />By Angelique Lucero <br /> <br />In cities and counties across the United <br />States, building and improving public <br />infrastructure -- whether it is rebuilding a <br />bridge, repairing a run-down street, updating <br />a sewer system or resurrecting a recreation <br />facility -- is necessary to maintain a good <br />quality of life. <br /> But when it comes to financing these new <br />projects and improvements, the argument <br />often arises about who will pay for them and <br />how much they will pay. A community may <br />need to refurbish its local senior facility, for <br />instance, but residents may not want to reach <br />into their own pockets to fund the improve- <br />ment. Further, the reasons for the improve- <br />ment may not be clear to them. In using any <br />of the funding mechanisms discussed below, <br /> <br />garnering public support is imperative. The <br />parties responsible for paying the bills need to <br />have input into what is funded and how <br />much should be funded. <br /> <br />DEVELOPER IMPACT FEES <br />Developer impact fees, if allowed through <br />a state's enabling legislation, have become <br />one important tool for funding public facili- <br />ties and improvements necessary to support <br />new growth. City management has come to <br />accept the concept that developers who pros- <br />per from this growth should be responsible for <br />the cost of providing facilities necessary to <br />accommodate it. <br /> Today, many developers are required to <br />pay impact fees and a portion of assessments <br /> <br />~2 May 1997 AMERICAN CITY ~. COUNTY <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.