Laserfiche WebLink
Aycock site $275,000 ($11,000/acre for 25 acres) to help pay for the <br />expanded gymnasium at tile Aycock school. <br /> <br />FY 97-98 OPTIONAL INITIATIVES FOR FURTItER CONSIDERATION <br /> <br />Most of thes. e items are not specifically addressed within the proposed FY 97-98 <br />budget. However if acted upon favorably by the Board of Commissioners would <br />require subseq.uent action to amend the budget as present.ed: <br /> <br />1. Education <br /> <br />Funding of school system's facility needs may be addressed if the North <br />Carolina Legislature allows Cabarrus Citizens the opportunity to decide on a <br />local option sales tax and-a local option property transfer tax as <br />recommended by the A!tematives' Revenue Task Force. <br /> <br />An EffOrt to achieve more effective and efficient facility maintenance <br />practices of county educational buildings and grounds needs to be 'pursued. <br />Consolidation of systems now in place or development of new processes <br />could enhance the level of facility maintenance for education and county <br />structures. Discussions related to this issue are underway. Adjustments to <br />the manner in Which the Coianty handles the fmancial aspects of this process <br />will requir, e attention to cost allocation. <br /> <br />In real dollars, the oPerational expenditures for education are increasing. <br />Growth alone accounts for an ever rising allocation of 'current expense' <br />funding for education. Disproportionate growth ·rates tend to reduce or limit <br />state and local dollars going t6 the Kannapolis School System. It appears <br />that 'capital outlay' allocations to the Kannapolis School System have <br />exceeded the ADM ratio in recent years. No significant factor has been <br />identified as to why the two ~ystems should remain apart. No formal effort <br />has been initiated to develop a plan to unify the county's education systems. <br />The importance of this issue is too dynamic to ignore. It is proposed that an <br />independeht study be sough't that will lay the ground work for an orderly <br />consolidation of the two school systems. This study should not attempt to. <br />identify or justify positive or negative reasons why the twO systems should or <br />should not be merged. The purpose of the study should be to identify <br />opportunities a consolidated system would be able to pursue and alternative <br />approaches to bring' about an orderly merger of. the County's two school <br />systems, . . <br /> <br />2. Consolidation and Further Coordination QfCitv and County Services <br /> <br />· During FY 96-97, tile City of Concord and Cabarrus County successfully <br /> combined animal control operations under the Sherift's Depamnent. The <br /> <br />County began construction of a new animal control facility on land provided <br />by. the City· Tiffs.system seems to be working. The County transferred <br />operational responsibilities for control of the Coddle Creek Reservoir to the <br />Water·and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County. The County also sold 'its <br />facilities on t-lighwgy 73 to WSACC and used those funds to help pay for <br />the new General S~rvices facility being constructed adjacent to the new <br />animal control facility. <br /> <br />An opportunity to devel~>p a consolidated set of land use and growth <br />management regulations for the county and each of its four ntunic, ipalities is <br />agoal that should be pursued. The costs associated.with this effort should be <br />divided ~imong the participants. <br /> <br /> · The City Of Concord and Cabarrus County currently operate an 'ahnost' <br /> consolidafed library system· Economie~ of scale are achieved except that <br /> · operational differences' between the City and County for personnel, <br /> purchasing and other minor issues result in some inefficiencies. Generally, <br /> the public is unaware of the differences which is probably reason enough to <br /> pursue a total consolidation. The increased cost to the county and likewise <br /> reduction in cost to the city would be approximately $400,000 annually~ An <br /> effort to develop a phased transition into full consolidation could begin if <br /> both entities agreed. ' <br /> ... <br /> <br />3. County Service and Organizational Restructurin~ <br /> <br /> · The creation of the Public Health Authority provided for a shift of animai <br /> control functions from the Health Department to the Sheriffs Department. <br /> Likewise, the movement of the Health Department to the Public Health <br /> Authority provides the opportunity, to move the County's landfill operations. <br /> The Deputy County Manager - Operations. will overs6e orga~,izational and <br /> staffing modifications necessary to accomplish this change. <br /> <br />The.relocation of Public Health and Social Services creates an opportunity to <br />review the appropriateness of the current Emergency ManagemenffFire <br />Marshal Department status. It is proposed that durifig FY 97-98, an'effort to <br />develop a better arrangement for staffing and operational considerations will <br />be addressed. <br /> <br />As part of a localized erosion control management program, staffing <br />.assignments will need to be addressed. First, it is intended that a civil <br />engineer (required by the State) will be employed to oversee erosion control <br />permitting and plan review. Actual inspection of erosion control measures <br />will be assumed 'by Development Services with staffing to coincide with ' <br />permit demand an~] revenues. This program will be fee based. <br /> <br /> <br />