Laserfiche WebLink
Siting Cellular Towers: What You Need to Know, What You Need to Do <br /> <br />In most parts of the United States, there only are two <br />companies providing cellular telephone service today. But the <br />Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has authorized <br />two more companies to provide personal communications. <br />services (PCS), the next generation of personal wireless <br />services, in each of the major markets. Soon, the FCC will <br />authorize up to four more PCS providers in each of the smaller <br />basic trading markets in the nation. <br /> <br />In many areas, therefore, local officials can expect to see as <br />many as eight providers seeking facilities to site antennas in <br />their communities during the next year. The number of such <br />antennas could grow in the United States by more than six <br />times - to 120,000 - by the year 2000. <br /> <br />The companies planning to offer PCS service have already <br />made a huge up-front investment. The federal government <br />awards PCS licenses through an auction process which to date <br />has generated almost $20 billion for the federal treasury. Some <br />PCS providers paid more than $500 million for a license in a <br />single market. Each provider wants to build its network <br />quickly and obtain a competitive edge in the market. <br /> <br />In addition, consumer demand for personal wireless services is <br />growing tremendously in response to the introduction of light- <br />weight portable phones and increasingly affordable rates and <br />equipment prices. Today, more than 40 million Americans use <br />these services. That number is expected to grow to more than <br />100 million by the year 2000. The growth also reflects the <br />importance of wireless services to businesses in general and to <br />selected business operations. <br /> <br />Many residents object to the placement of new antennas and <br />towers in their communities. They are concerned that these <br />facilities will jeopardize human health and safety, damage <br />private property, and compromise the community's aesthetics. <br />They worry that 200-foot towers may present safety hazards in <br />bad weather, such as ice storms or hurricanes. They are <br />unhappy about the prospect of locating unsecured towers near <br />school playgrounds. They are nervous about the electro- <br />magnetic radiation generated by a cellular communications <br />facility. Finally, they do not want to see large, unsightly <br />antenna towers dispersed throughout the community cluttering <br />the landscape and reducing their property values. <br /> <br />Local government officials are faced with the challenge of <br />balancing the demand for wireless service with the concerns of <br />residents. <br /> <br />To date, the response of local governments to the tower siting <br />dilemma has varied, ranging from blind acceptance of industry <br />demands to active participation as partners in the siting <br />process. Many cities and counties have amended their zoning <br />ordinances to accommodate the growth of wireless systems and <br />the communications needs of residents and businesses while <br />protecting the public against any adverse impacts. Some <br />jurisdictions, in the process of reviewing their laws, have <br />adopted moratoria on the granting of any new applications <br />pending completion of the review process. <br /> <br />Many localities also have formed partnerships to deal effectively <br />with the siting of cellular towers in their communities. These <br />parmerships take many forms, including agreements between <br />service providers and local governments to site antenna facilities <br />on public property and agreements to construct new towers to <br />support the facilities of both public and private wireless services <br />networks. By entering into partnerships, local governments may <br />improve their own public safety and other communications <br />systems and reap additional revenue as well. Some cities and <br />counties are cooperating across jurisdictional boundaries to <br />develop a comprehensive uniform approach to the siting of <br />wireless facilities within their region. <br /> <br />The pages that follow describe what personal wireless sen. ices <br />are, explain what limits the 1996 Telecommunications Act <br />places on local government zoning authority, and describe steps <br />local governments are taking to develop effective cellular tower <br />ordinances and siting policies. <br /> <br />The guidebook is designed to help local officials meet the <br />challenge of reconciling industry's goal - the rapid building of <br />wireless networks -with long-term community goals and the <br />legitimate concerns residents have about antenna and tower <br />facilities. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />