My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1995 06 19
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1995
>
AG 1995 06 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 4:36:40 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:57:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
6/19/1995
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bo <br /> <br />reasonable and which will withstand close scrutiny. This is why the Level of <br />Service and Cost Factor Document is more than just a series of numbers, it is also <br />a narrative which describes the LOS and relevant factors to the reader. It is also <br />why a case study-marginal cost approach is needed which reflects fiscal analysis <br />zones for the County. <br /> <br />Methodology <br /> <br />As indicated in the cover letter, there are several methodologies one could utilize <br />to evaluate the fiscal impacts. The most common is the average cost-per capita <br />approach. The major problem with this methodology is that it masks timing as <br />well as geographic issues. For example, if the parks and recreation budget were <br />divided by population to derive a per capita figure, this figure would be applied <br />to population regardless of where and when the new housing occurred. Under the <br />case study-marginal cost approach, the available capacity of parks would be <br />ascertained, and the need for a new park would be forecasted with the resulting <br />capital costs for land, equipment and other capital items. Once open, the costs to <br />maintain and operate that park would be incorporated. Other relevant operating <br />costs would also be noted. The location of 200 homes in a newly developing area <br />of the County could have a significantly different impact than if those 200 homes <br />were distributed in more of an infill situation. This would be reflected in the case <br />study-marginal cost approach. <br /> <br />A less common approach is the comparable community methodology. This <br />methodology basically assumes that a County of a comparable population size to <br />a future Cabarrus County could be utilized to project the County's future needs. <br />Based on a study using this methodology, which TA was hired to critique, as well <br />as TA's own experience in evaluating very comparable jurisdictions, each <br />community is unique. That is why th.is methodology is less frequently used than <br />it has been in the past. <br /> <br />The scope of work discussed in the next section, assumes the utilization of the <br />case study-marginal cost approach. We will be pleased to discuss the tradeoffs <br />in terms of fiscal reality and credibility with you. <br /> <br />Tischler & Associates, Inc-- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.