My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1993 05 17
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1993
>
AG 1993 05 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 4:15:59 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:59:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
5/17/1993
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REZONING PETITION 93-02 <br /> April 15, 1993 <br /> Phil W. Cline, Petitioner <br /> <br />for evaluation and final determination. <br /> <br /> .Water & sewer. The site is served by City water. Sewer service is available with a <br />major trunk line (shown on attachment 4) operated by the County Sewer & Water authority <br />traversing the property. <br /> <br /> Environmental There are several points to consider under the general heading of <br />"environmental." One, the entire western and southern borders of the parcels at issue are <br />demarcated by a perennial stream, Irish Buffalo Creek. Perennial streams are defined as always <br />having water flow and appear as blue lines on USGS quadrangle maps. Additionally, they are <br />protected under the River/Stream Overlay Zone of the County Zoning Ordinance which prevents <br />any development within 50 feet of the "average annual stream banks" plus additional footage <br />calculated on the basis of slope. In essence, the buffer keeps pollutants from entering the stream. <br />Please see page 30 of the Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance for a complete explanation. <br />Another aspect of the stream that should be noted is its tendency to create a natural transition <br />buffer to parcels adjoining it. For example, if high density residential were to develop on the <br />next parcel down on Highway 49 (to the west), the stream would act as a natural buffer. <br />Additionally, much of the proposed rezoning lies within floodplain with its more severe building <br />code requirements (filling and higher base floor elevations) also serving to deter building near <br />the vicinity of the stream. <br /> Secondly, there is the question of runoff generated by large expanses of paving. This <br />is an area under the jurisdiction of the State Department of Environmental Health & Natural <br />Resources. Prior to the development of more than one acre, Mr. Cline will have to get a <br />sedimentation and erosion control permit from the State. The permit will only be issued if any <br />adverse environmental effects from his proposed activities can be mitigated. <br /> <br /> ~ : Visual There should be no detrimental visual effects if the property is rezoned. The <br />bulk of the land area would not be visible to the passing motorist on Highway 49. If anything, <br />the commitment of a permanent vegetative buffer assures neighboring residences a greatly need <br />screen from the industrial use. <br /> <br /> In Summa~_. The effects of approving the requested rezoning are not anticipated to be <br />negative. Instead, the dedication of a permanent vegetative buffer will help assure <br />industrial/residential friction is kept to a minimum. The ability of the petitioner to obtain land <br />area away from his residential neighbors upon which to orient his parking is also seen as an <br />improvement. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.