Laserfiche WebLink
RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />The end result of the area plan study, the community meetings and <br />the issues and goals derived from both is the recommendations <br />section. These recommendations in combination with the Future Land <br />Use Map will be the guide for effective management of growth and <br />development in the North Central Area. <br /> <br />The recommendation and the Future Land Use Map were formulated <br />based on three underlying assumptions. These assumptions are (1) <br />that development should be supported by adequate public facilities <br />and services, (2) that the design and type of development Will meet <br />current and future needs of residents and businesses, and (3) that <br />quality of life issues should not be compromised, but improved. <br /> <br />There are three parts to this section of the plan, and they must be <br />used together to be used properly. The three sections are the <br />Future Land Use Map, the accompanying text and the recommendations <br />table. A more in depth discussion of the land use map will follow, <br />but in general it is a representation of how the area should look <br />in twenty years. The text is a discussion of the map and details <br />the specific issues and growth factors that were used to formulate <br />the land use map. It also is a discussion of the recommendations. <br />The final section is the recommendations table which provides <br />specific actions for each recommendation, a list of the parties <br />responsible for action on each action and a time frame in which <br />that action should take place. <br /> <br />In the process of determining future land use and preparing a land <br />use map, general categories were devised to encompass potential <br />land uses. These categories include low density <br />residential/agricultural, medium density residential, high density <br />residential, commercial, industrial, future employment, <br />institutional, and recreational. <br /> <br />The titles of the residential categories are relative in nature. <br />For example, the high density category, at the minimum density of <br />four units per acre with appropriate utilities, would actually be <br />low or medium density in an urban setting, depending on the <br />corresponding zoning classifications. The density specified does <br />not guarantee that individual projects will automatically qualify <br />for the maximum density nor does it require that development occur <br />at the minimum density. However, it represents a general range <br />with maximum density appropriate under certain conditions. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />