Laserfiche WebLink
\ · <br /> <br /> Recommended <br /> Alternate Alternate Alternate .Alternate <br /> lA lB 2A 2B <br />Structure $280,000 $387,000 $ 435,000 $ 586,000 <br />Roadway Approaches 131,000- 119,000 453,000 433,000 <br />Detour 169,000 169,000 - <br />Structure Removal 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 <br />Right-of-Way, <br /> Utilities 43,000 43~000 189,000 189,000 <br /> TOTAL $643;000 $738,000 $1,097,000 $1,228,000 <br /> <br /> ~he above estimates include 10 percent for engineering <br />and contingencies. <br /> <br /> V. Discussion of Recommended Improvements <br /> <br />A. Alignment <br /> Two b%asic replacement concepts were studied. The first <br />concept (Alternates iA and lB) consists of three-lane improve- <br />ments (on US 601) along the existing alignment with a temporary <br />detour bridge on the east side. The second concept (Alternates <br />2A and 2B) consists of five-lane improvements with a slight <br />alignment shift to the west and traffic maintained on the <br />exis.ting bridge. <br /> <br /> The ttLree-lane concept lends itself to symmetrical <br />widening but the five-lane concept necessitates an alignment <br />shift to the west for two reasons. <br /> <br /> First, the five-lane structure is of sufficient width <br />that construction in half-stages is possible. Secondly,~ <br />widening to five lanes must be accomplished generally to the <br />west of the existing bridge. Widening symmetrically would <br />encroach upon the existing ramps on the east side of the <br />bridge. This would necessitate revisions to the ramp radii <br />and grades. <br /> <br />B. Right-of-Way <br /> <br /> Shifting the alignment to the west requires acquisition <br />of two residences and the Cabarrus County Ambulance Service <br />in the northwest quadrant of the interchange. These reloca- <br />tions are necessary if the construction of a temporary <br />detour bridge is to be avoided. The cost of these three <br />acquisitions ($146,000) is less than the cost of a temporary <br />detour structure ($169,000). <br /> <br /> Although acquisition of homes and businesses is never <br />desirable, the removal of associated driveway entrances from <br />the interchange area is justifiable from a traffic operations <br />standpoint. The existihg driveways (especially those opposite <br />the north ramp terminal) are undesirable. Only right-turn <br />access is available. The problem will be compounded with the <br />construction of additional lanes in the interchange area. <br /> <br /> <br />