My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG19861020
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1986
>
AG19861020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2003 9:14:04 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 12:11:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
10/20/1986
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: Charles D. McGinn]s, County Manager <br />FROM: Thomas B. Robinson, Planning Director <br />DATE: September 22, lg86 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Fees for sign installation in new subdivisions and <br /> City of Kannapolis <br /> <br />At present Cabarrus County pays the cost of installing <br />street signs in newly developed subdivisions. The cost to <br />the County is $?5 to ~ installed sign. Subdivision <br />activity is increasing~ch year in the county and will <br />explode if planned sewer lines are developed. Street sign <br />installation is part of the cost of developing a subdivision <br />and should be born by the developer. Several years ago the <br />County Commisioners instituted the present practice of the <br />County paying the cost of street sign installation in new <br />subdivisions because there wes a back log of grandfathered <br />subdivisions that were being processed and the County felt <br />it should bear the expense of installing signs in these <br />subdivisions. This work has been completed and the County <br />Commisioners may now want to reconsider the policy on <br />street sign installation in new subdivisions. I recommend <br />that the subdivider bear the cost of installing the first <br />street sign with the county providing maintenance_ <br />thereafter. <br /> <br />In a related matter, the County. is still installing and <br />maintaining street signs in the City of Kannapol'is at no <br />charge. I would recommend that the Commissioners consider <br />entering an agreement with the City of Kannapolis to <br />continue doing this work at the cost of providing this <br />service or the City should consider taking over this <br />responsibility. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.