Laserfiche WebLink
reflect conflicts rich zoning or vith the character of the <br /> <br /> existing development specific to the site. <br /> <br /> Economic viability of site at location (5 points). All <br /> sites are physically possible of being developed. Full <br /> value reflects ideal circumstances of being located closest <br /> to the potential users, i.e., Concord and Kannapolis. This <br /> variable also reflects an impact which may occur due to <br /> usage by those from outside the county boundary. ~ucb <br /> consideration responds to the existing corridors of access. <br /> <br />· Land Ava~labilitT <br /> <br /> Estimated number of property owners involved in site (8 <br /> points). Full value if there is but one. Decreasing values <br /> in increments of 5 estimated property owners i.e., .9 value <br /> at 2-6 property owners; .8 at ?-11 property owners, etc. <br /> <br /> Willingness of property owners to sell (5 points). Full <br /> value if the property would-be sold at:-expected market rate <br /> willingly~ -Variable takes intoconsideration-willin~ness of <br /> property owner's to sell but at an inflated pro~rty value <br /> as well as the unwillingness of property owners to sell, <br /> thereby requiring condemnation. -- <br /> <br /> - Environmental concerns of site impacting land availability <br /> (2 points). Full value if there are not environmental <br /> concerns. Values decline if there are environmental <br /> <br /> concerns on site which must be dealt with, such as the <br /> concern of a reservoir adjacent ~ an airport at the Coddle <br /> Creek site. <br /> <br /> <br />