Laserfiche WebLink
(4) Suitability of Plans. <br /> <br /> Do to there being no special features for this PDO, no PDO <br /> report or plan has been submitted and is not needed. Again <br /> the contemplated use of this PDD provision is not within the <br /> main intent for PDO use. <br /> <br /> (5) Adherence to or Modification of PDO Requirements. <br /> <br /> I can not see limiting applicant to only one use for there <br /> property as requested. A better provision would be to limit <br /> use to all uses but the one (administrative offices) objected <br /> to by neighbors or have a provision that if planned use ceases <br /> for a certain time period, the zoning classification would <br /> revert back to the original classification or existing classifica- <br /> tion of adjoining property. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />If the County Commissioners desire to grant this request, I would recon~nend the <br />following modifications to the applicant. <br /> <br />I do not recommend the C-4/PDO as requested because I feel that the single lot <br />C-4 is spot zoning. I ~lso have reset.rations about opening up the use of PDO's <br />every time.semeone~wants-t~-restri~t-a~se-unles~ th~ope~a~ion:is~.substantial:...:~-.~ <br />and inv~lYe~).arge tYler'of land. <br /> <br />I would pref~r ~h~t' th~-YA'd~s~ati~T6~ffj~e .Pmovision.-bme-ither deleted or <br />changed-~-~-'~nditionalF~e.~nd_~he, enti.r~ currenb,,C-5.zone-changed-%o,.either- :'- <br />C-2 or ~-~.~:- S" <br /> <br />If howev~,.~the Cou~ty-Commtssioners'are'incl.in~d.tb;~p~rove .thi-s, request,-.I <br />would re~ol~hend the f611~win~odification. <br /> <br /> {1) If the planneduse'~used car lot ceases to-operate fora continuous ' <br /> perio'd'~f-)80 days, then the use will revert back to original zoning <br /> or current adjacent zoning. <br /> <br /> <br />