Laserfiche WebLink
k RESOLUTION URGING GREATER STATE ASSISTANCE TO HELP THE COUNTIES <br />IN DEFENDING LEGAL CIIALLENGES TO THE PROPERTY 'FAX <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the major railroads in North Carolina brought a lawsuit' <br />in federal district court, against Secretary of Revenue blark Lynch <br />and Ad Valorem Tax Division Director Doug Holbrook, challenging <br />the level of naxatio,] ,-,f their p~.uperty in 87 counties in relation <br />to all other property in each jurisdiction for the 1980 tax year; and <br /> <br /> WliEREAS, the crial court rendered a decision iix that case <br />adverse to the defendants and the several counties on two main <br />legal points, and although the inteut of the lawsuit was to correct <br />an inequity iu the property aax treatmenu of ~;ai!roads, the effect <br />of the decision from the connty goverrunent v~ewpoint has been to <br />create another inequity by placing the railroads in an unwarranted, <br />favored tax status; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, other annually assessed property taxpayers are likely <br />to consider similar legal challenges, and the effect could he to <br />place an inequitable, disproportionate tax burden on residential <br />real property taxpayers; snd <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, mos~ counties affected by the 1980 lawsuit faced <br />a potentially small tax revenue loss compared to the legal expense <br />of individually defending the suit; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, only Mecklenburg and bladison Counties directly <br />intervened in the lawsuit, b~t the several co:~nties, though not <br />joined as defendants, collectively raised in excess of $46,000 to <br />hire outside legal counsel to assure t~'~at the counties' collective <br />concerns were a~ least addressed; and <br /> <br /> I~{EREAS, the Attorney General's office has assigned one of its <br />Assistant Attorney Generals in the Revenue Section to ~¢epresent <br />state-level defendants, but because of his m[~ny other duties and <br />responsibilities he has been able to devote nnly a porcion of his <br />time to the railroad lawsuit; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, state law governs the administration of the property <br />tax, including the requirement for an octenn~al revaluation cycle <br />for real property; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, a legislative study co~mnittee is looking at the <br />feasibility of requiring more frequent revaluations and county <br />officials generally support this effort, but any legislative <br />solution to the problem will take many years to implement fully <br />because of the financial expense, technological improvements, ~nd <br />increased qualified personnel that will be necessary to assure <br />accurate revaluations on a more frequent basis, and in ~-he meantime <br />other lawsuits may be brought by annually assessed property <br />taxpayers; and <br /> <br /> <br />