My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG19790212
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1979
>
AG19790212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2003 9:13:19 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 12:16:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
2/12/1979
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CABARRUS COUNTY <br /> Post Office l~ex 707 <br /> CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA 28025 <br /> <br /> TO: Charles McGinnis/County Manager <br /> FROM: W. S. Chandler/Director of Planning'~~-~ <br /> RE: Road Petitions <br /> <br /> DATE: January 18, 1979 <br /> <br /> In recent conversation with Mr. T. L. Patterson of the North <br /> Carolina DOT office in regard to subdivision design and the <br /> requirements that the State has for roads, the subject of the <br /> State assuming maintenance of roads in the County and the process <br /> involved, fell under discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Patterson stated that the Department of Transportation only <br />required that a petition be completed and mailed to them, and <br />that a resolution by the Board of County Commissioners was not <br />required each time a petition was submitted to the State. A <br />formal resolution by the Board of Commissioners is only required <br />by the State when they accept the responsibility of its mainten- <br />ance. Mr. Patterson also remarked that the State at that time <br />would contact the County officials for a formal resolution on the <br />roads that they could accept for maintenance. <br /> <br />Since we are working to resolve duplications of street and road <br />names as well as subdivision names in the course of day to day <br />operations, we will be working closely with the State on these <br />matters. If you approve, road petitions could be handled direct- <br />ly through this office. After submission, we could check for <br />any inconsistancies and then forward them to the State office. <br /> <br />If you would consider this method of processing the road petitions <br />~nd should you feel it would be beneficial, please advise, <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.