My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG19780105
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1978
>
AG19780105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2003 9:13:14 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 12:17:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
1/5/1978
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Produce a User ~fanual for each of the acquired systems. <br /> <br /> S. Produce an Installation ~lanual for each software system <br /> for each installation. <br /> <br /> 7. Evaluate thelacquired software systems in a written <br /> report. Prominent features of each sustem will 'be <br /> discussed. In addition, transportability criteria are to <br /> be ascertained and documented as fully as possible. <br /> <br /> These required services would begin around February 1, 1978, <br /> and would be completed in the eight months ending around <br /> September 50, 1978. <br /> <br /> Potential Savings <br /> <br /> And/Or B~nefJts <br /> <br /> What kind of savings or benefits could a county expect to <br /> receive from participation in a consortium to acquire computer <br /> software? It would depend upon which of several options they <br /> elect to take and when the revaluation was required to be <br /> effective. Several examples of savings: <br /> <br /> Example 1: County wishes to acquire software but intends to <br /> use county employees for all phases of an in-house revaluation. <br /> Such counties are being quoted prices ranging from $2S,000 to <br /> $S0,000 for the right to use (not own) the software. Savings <br /> would be the difference between what they would be forced to pay <br /> to acquire such a system less their share of the cofisortium. <br /> <br /> Example 2: County wishes to acquire software now but revaluation <br /> is nor due for several years. Savings wnuld be in the revaluation <br /> contract provided county used the time between no*e and contract <br /> time to load data on computer. County personnel working in their <br /> slack times or CETA personnel could save as much as 25% of the <br /> revaluation cost by eliminating the hand sketching of buildings, <br /> computing areas, table look-ups, etc. and using experienced <br /> appraisers to visit the property rather than inexperienced listers. <br /> The appraiser would have a copy of the latest information available <br /> on the property and after his visit would only have to correct any wrong <br /> information rather than complete all parts of the present property <br /> record card. Land values and building values would still be based <br /> on human judgement but the adding machines and calculators would <br /> be obsolete. <br /> <br />Example 3: County needs to start revaluation during 1978 and wishes <br />to acquire software in conjunction with other counties primarily <br />for security purposes. Savings would not be as great as in <br />example'II because a traditional revaluation would still be <br />necessary. How much a particular firm would reduce their bid price <br />to install thexr system is an unknown factor at this point. It is <br />common practice for a firm to recover their system development costs <br />as soon as possible spread over the first few contracts. Firms <br />will still attempt to recover those development cost§ when possible. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.