My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG19780608
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1978
>
AG19780608
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2003 9:13:14 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 12:17:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
6/8/1978
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Talber Cox & A ociate <br /> <br /> JO.NC..LACK&S.OC.A.I.P. June 1, 1978 <br /> <br /> Mr. Charles McGinnis, <br /> County Manager <br /> P. O. Box 707 <br /> Concord, North Carolina 28025 <br /> <br /> Re: Proposed Cabarrus County Airport <br /> TCA Project No. 445 <br /> <br /> Dear Mr. McGinnls: <br /> <br /> We have attached a partial billing for professional ser- <br /> vices rendered which reflects an amount less than our January <br /> billing and in line with the work done to date. <br /> <br /> In late January, we sent Cabarrus County a bill for com- <br /> pletion of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) <br /> and Phase II, the Site Selection Study, of the Airport Master <br /> Plan Report. At that time, Cabarrus County bad in hand final <br /> draft copies of both reports and both reports had been sent to <br /> FAA for final approval. However, at that time, FAA had not <br /> approved either document nor had Cabarrus County committed <br /> themselves to the site evaluated in-depth by the EIAR. Per- <br /> haps, the billing for completion of both reports was premature. <br /> <br /> Since that time essentially little has changed. T~e Phase <br /> II report has been in the Atlanta Office of FAA, pending review, <br /> since late January. I have personally been calling FAA weekly ~-~ <br /> for over a month now trying to see some progress and gauge the <br /> status o~ the Site Selection Study. I have bee~ told the Phase ..... <br /> I~R~eport will most likel~ be acce~ted as it st_a~~-~-- <br /> ~owar~--M. Robinson and Mr. ~"~"~_.~3'~--'~~ tO Concord <br /> t~gC~ff~_~i~ ~5 and several other sites, most likely num- <br /> bers 6A, 7, 10, and 18. They want to be well prepared to dis- <br /> cuss the merits of Site ~5 with relation to the others should <br /> questions arise. As you know, there is a Congressional Inquiry. <br /> It remains that the Phase II'Report you have in hand is rif- <br /> t u a 1 ~y__qom~~ ~n~ ~"' s~ g n~o--f~. Ta e r e ~o-b-ce, w e-- f~Fel'-i t <br /> ~ in li~ ~~6~p~fal billing for 80 percent <br /> completion of Phase II, i.e., $8,112.00 of the $10,140 total. <br /> <br /> The EIAR has undergone numerous changes although its status <br /> remains almost the same. ~s of the <br /> have been a~ed a new [oi~e ~naly_~is has b~ ~d~d~ a mo~e in- <br /> ~t~-~d'~ s'~uss~-n o f the~ a_~lt~er~.~ a_~i~es~---ha ~b~--w--ni~.te-~ a~ ~-~ <br /> <br />..... ................. ..... .............. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.