Laserfiche WebLink
RECO~IENDED APPROACH FOR ASSESSING LOCAL YOUTH NEEDS <br /> <br /> Since the summer of 1975 with the passage of House Bill 456, counties have <br />been asked to examine the problems and opportunities that exist for adolescents in. <br />their communities who are either in trouble with the law or are headed in that <br />direction. <br /> <br /> House Bill 456 outlined a time schedule for reporting to the Department of <br />Human Resources regarding these activities, This reporting scheduled was intended <br />as a guide for action rather than another requirement placed upon local government by <br />the State. <br /> <br /> The community-based alternatives effort in North Carolina is not a State govern- <br />merit program. It is a policy direction initiated by the General Assembly in 1975 in <br />response to the established fact that the solutions to the rising trend in juvenile <br />crime have not been found by the State's institutional programs developed over the <br />past thirty years, but rather can best be found through the mobilization of com- <br />munity resources directed at the child in his own community, Therefore, the com- <br />munity-based alternatives effort is a partnership between local government ~nd state <br />government in the mobilization of resources at the community level with the pro~ <br />vision of technical and financial assistance at the State level, <br /> <br /> The following is a suggested format for counties to follow in their needs assess- <br />ment process for 1977; <br /> <br /> I. Identify what already exists in a given county for juvenile delinquents and <br /> children at risk. Such a resource inventory of the programs and methods <br /> of diversion that already exist is a logical beginning point. <br /> <br /> II. Outline the existing conditions in the county which are indicators of youth <br /> 'needs. Such indicators might include but are not limited to the following: <br /> <br /> a. The number of status offenders committed to training school from the <br /> county in 1976. <br /> <br /> b. The number of juyeniles committed to training school from the county <br /> in 1976 for a delinquent act, but whose original offense was a status <br /> offense, <br /> c, The number Of juvenile court petitions alleging a status offense by <br /> county i'n the year 1976. <br /> <br /> d, The absolute number of youths in the age range ten through seventeen in the county, <br /> <br /> e. The oumber of high school dropouts by county in 1976, <br /> <br /> f. The number of neglected or abused children reported in the county in <br /> 1976. <br /> <br /> g. A breakdown of the number of families receiving AFDC payments, families <br /> with female heads, and children in foster care in 1976. <br /> h. The number of families with children per county below the proverty level <br /> ..... in 1976. <br /> i. The suspension and expulsion rate in the county. <br /> j. The number Of children diverted from the juvenile justice system.and <br /> a determination at what point diversions are and are not being made <br /> in the county, <br /> <br /> <br />