My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 1981 06 01
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
1981
>
BC 1981 06 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2002 3:04:53 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 12:32:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
6/1/1981
Board
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
534 <br /> <br /> This resolution is conditioned upon the execution of a Guaranty <br />Agreement by Newhouse approved by the County Attorney. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Lentz and <br />unanimously carried, the Board reappointed Ms. Mildred Almond to the <br />Region F Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council of the Centralina <br />Council of Governments. <br /> Mr. Charles McGinnis, County Manager, briefly presented background <br />information pertaining to the Special Annuity Fund for law enforcement <br />officers in Cabarrus County. He informed the Board that in the past the <br />County had provided a 5 percent contribution to this fund as a special <br />incentive to law enforcement officers employed by the County. However, <br />in 1979 a change in the law enacted by the General Assembly mandated that <br />the County pay a 3.8 percent employer contribution that had previously been <br />provided by the State to the basic Law Enforcement Benefit and Retirement <br />Fund. Mr. McGinnis read the resolution adopted by the Board in September, <br />1979 which stated that the County would pay the State mandated 3.8 percent <br />contribution from the 5 percent special contribution previously provided by <br />the County and would continue to pay the remaining 1.2 percent as a <br />voluntary contribution to the special retirement allowance. He further <br />explained the 1980-81 budget was prepared using this distribution formula <br />for law enforcement retirement. The County was notifed in July, 1980 after <br />the adoption of the 1980-81 County budget that the General Assembly had <br />enacted a new law whereby local governments were no longer required to pay <br />the employer contribution necessary to fund the basic retirement allowance <br />of local officers in the Law Enforcement Officers' ~enefit and Retirement <br />Fund effective July 1, 1980. The General Assembly had appropriated at that <br />time such contributions from the State's General Fund to replace the local <br />governments' contributions. Mr. McGinnis advised the Board that the County <br />had not resumed the practice of sending in 5 percent of the gross salary for <br />each law enforeement officer to the special annuity fund. <br /> Sheriff J. B. Roberts addressed the Board requesting that the money <br />budgeted in the 1980-81 budget be paid into the Law Enforcement R~tirement <br />Fund and asked that the County match the retirement for law enforcement <br />officers in the same matter it does for the other County employees. He <br />informed the Board that the County had provided a 5 percent contribution <br />to the law enforcement fund for over 30 years. Sheriff Roberts stated the <br />Law Enforcement Officers' Benefit and Retirement Fund was funded by fees <br />assessed on court costs and did not receive any matching funds from the <br />State. <br /> Commissioner Nash reviewed material which stated that 6 percent of each <br /> officer's salary is deducted as his personal contribution to the basic retire- <br /> ment fund and that 4.78 percent is contributed by the State. He stated the <br /> County pays the employer matching funds for retirement benefits for County <br /> employees but he explained that a contribution by the County to law enforcement <br /> retirement would be in the form of a special retirement allowance. <br /> Lieutenant I. T. Yow and Detective Harley Tucker of the Kannapolis Police <br /> Department informed the Board that the County had been providing a matching <br /> 5 percent contribution to the law enforcement retirement fund and that the <br /> State had never contributed matching funds for the Cabarrus County law <br /> enforcement officers. Detective Tucker stated the retirement fund for local <br /> officers is based on the 6 percent personal contribution, 5 percent matching <br /> contribution by the County, and the number of years of service of each <br /> individual officer. <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Lentz and <br /> unanimously carried, the Board moved to pay a 5 percent contribution to the <br /> Special Annuity Fund of the Law Enforcement Officers' Benefit and Retirement <br /> Fund for Cabarrus County law enforcement officers beginning with the 1980-81 <br /> budget and continuing hereafter at the 5 percent contribution. <br /> Commissioner Lentz stated the County was obligated to provide this <br /> 5 percent contribution to the law.enforcement officers' retirement fund as <br /> it had historically been done in the County. He described the 5 percent <br /> contribution as an "added incentive" for law enforcement officers. <br /> Commissioner Nash stated that law enforcement officers would be the only <br /> persons entitled to this special retirement allowance and that contribution <br /> by the County to this ~und would be in recognition of the special nature of <br /> law enforcement officers and their work. He addressed the law enforcement <br /> officers, stating the Board was rectifying a problem that its members were <br /> not aware of and that the Board was not only rectifying the situation but was <br /> increasing the County's participation in the special allowance fund for law <br /> enforcement officers from 1.2 percent to 5 percent, a net increase of 3.8 percent, <br /> which would be advantageous for each employee. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.