Laserfiche WebLink
585 <br /> <br /> Mr. Charles D. McGinnis, County Manager, presided over the organization <br />of the Cabarrus County Board of Commissioners. He called for nominations for <br />Chairman of the Board. <br /> Commissioner Payne nominated Commissioner Lentz for Chairman of the <br />Board. There were no other nominations. <br /> The Board unanimously elected Commissioner Lentz as Chairman. <br /> Mr. Charles D. McGinnis asked for nominations for Vice-Chairman. <br /> Commissioner Hamby nominated Commissioner Payne for Vice-Chairman. There <br />were no other nominations. <br /> The Board unanimously elected Commissioner Payne as Vice-Chairman. <br /> Chairman Lentz presided over the remainder of the meeting. <br />Mr. Aldo Rainey of Arthur Young & Company presented the Cabarrus County <br />Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1986. <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Payne, seconded by Commissioner Melvin and <br />unanimously carried, the Board moved to formally accept the fiscal audit for <br />Cabarrus County for the year ended June 30, 1986, as submitted by Arthur Young <br />& Company. <br /> The Board reviewed the following recommendations from Mr. Blair D. <br />Bennett, Finance Director, regarding the $14.5 million bond referendum for the <br />Coddle Creek project. <br /> <br />1) <br />2) <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />Selection of Brown, Wood, Ivey, Mitchell and Petty as bond counsel. <br />Designation of the Finance Director as the County's representative <br />to file the application for approval of the bonds with the Local <br />Government Commission. <br />Appointment of Henningson, Durham and Richardson as consulting <br />engineer for the Coddle Creek project. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Melvin, seconded by Commissioner Payne and <br />unanimously carried, the Board moved to retain Brown, Wood, Ivey, Mitchell and <br />Petty as bond counsel for the Coddle Creek project. <br /> UPON MOTION of Chairman Lentz, seconded by Commissioner Payne and unani- <br />mously carried, the Board designated the Finance Director as the County's <br />representative to file the application for approval of the bonds with the <br />Local Government Commission and as the contact person with regard to any <br />problems arising during authorization and sale of the bonds for the Coddle <br />Creek project. <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Hamby, seconded by Commissioner Melvin and <br />unanimously carried, the Board moved that the firm of Henningson, Durham and <br />Richardson (HDR Infrastructure, Inc.) be retained as the engineer for the <br />Coddle Creek project. <br /> The Board discussed a resolution calling a bond referendum for sewer and <br />briefly reviewed the Proposed Sewer Facilities Construction Cost Estimate <br />Summary totaling $28,251,000.00 that was submitted by HDR Infrastructure, Inc. <br />During review of the proposed sewer bond referendum, Chairman Lentz and <br />Commissioner Payne addressed the importance of the $14.5 million Coddle Creek <br />bond referendum scheduled for May 19, 1987. Chairman Lentz also reported that <br />the Elections Board had requested that the May 19th bond referendum be <br />rescheduled for June, 1987, to coincide with the Kannapolis Merger Election. <br />No action was taken regarding this request. <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Payne, seconded by Chairman Lentz and unani- <br />mously carried, the Board tabled the resolution calling for a bond referendum <br />for sewer. <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Payne, seconded by Commissioner Hamby and <br />unanimously carried, the Board approved the addition of Ellerbe Drive, Redfern <br />Drive, Morningside Court to the State road system. <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Melvin, seconded by Commissioner Moss and <br />unanimously carried, the Board adopted the following resolution. <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION <br /> BY <br />CABARRUS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, in North Carolina the Lead Regional Organizations, as voluntary <br />organizations serving municipal and county governments, have established <br />productive working relationships with the cities and counties across this <br />state; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, many counties and cities need assistance in pursuing economic <br />and community development opportunities, but federal assistance in the form of <br />intergovernmental revenues has been severely curtailed in recent years; and <br /> <br /> <br />