Laserfiche WebLink
259 <br /> <br /> The Board received the Preliminary Draft for Cabarrus County Utilities <br />System Capital Facilities Financing Policy for review. This preliminary draft <br />outlined the procedures by which the Board may finance up to 25 percent of the <br />cost of an approved water or sewer project with the remaining portion of the <br />cost to be furnished by private financiers. During review of the preliminary <br />draft of this policy, the Board also discussed the proposed development of the <br />Kings Grant project in Cabarrus County. <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Hamby, seconded by Commissioner Payne with <br />Commissioners Hamby and Payne and Chairman Lentz voting for and Commissioners <br />Melvin and Moss voting against, the Board moved to accept in principle the <br />following policy and directed that the specifics of this policy be developed <br />by the Utilities Board that the Board has proposed creating as an advisory <br />board to the Board of Commissioners: <br /> <br />That for private financing projects the County may elect to pay up to 25 <br />percent of the cost of a water or sewer project and the County may <br />guarantee any private financier a refund of 100 percent of their <br />expenditures over a maximum of five years with the following conditions: <br /> <br />It must apply only to main trunk line or main outfall lines. <br />It must be within the existing County proposed program. <br />Money must be in hand before the contract is let. <br />Each project would have to be approved by the Board of <br />Commissioners. <br /> <br /> The Board indicated that it would consider a request regarding the Kings <br />Grant Project at a later date. <br /> Chairman Lentz recessed the meeting of the Board of Commissioners at 4:15 <br />P.M. until the conclusion of the meeting of the Board of Commissioners for the <br />Water and Sewer District of Cabarrus County. <br /> Chairman Lentz reconvened the meeting of the Board at 4:20 P.M. <br /> The Board reviewed the request received in February, 1987, from Mayor <br />Bernie A. Edwards of the City of Concord for a settlement of $432,212.05 from <br />Cabarrus County for the Rocky River Wastewater Treatment Plant and related <br />interceptor lines. Mr. Charles D. McGinnis, County Manager, reported that Mr. <br />Blair Bennett, County Finance Director, and Mr. Paul Ijames, County Internal <br />Auditor, had analyzed the audits for the Rocky River Project and had presented <br />a number of questions and issues to the City's Finance Director for clarifi- <br />cation relating to the final settlement on the Project. The Board reviewed <br />the letter dated November 30, 1987, from Ms. Cathy Combs, Finance Director for <br />the City of Concord, in response to these questions as well as a letter <br />written by Mr. Bennett stating he had determined that a balance of $44,370.00 <br />was due the County from the City of Concord. <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Melvin, seconded by Chairman Lentz and <br />unanimously carried, the Board moved that the City be informed that they are <br />due the County $44,370.00 as per outlined in the following letter. <br /> <br />December 21, 1987 <br /> <br />To: <br />From: <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Charles D. McGinnis <br />Blair D. Bennett <br />Settlement on Rocky River Project <br /> <br />After discussions in October, 1987, with Cathy Combs, Finance Director for the <br />City of Concord, I submitted a list of questions and issues which the County <br />needed clarified relating to a final settlement on the Rocky River Wastewater <br />Treatment Plant Project. Mrs. Combs responded by letter to the various <br />questions posed by the County on November 30, 1987. I will address each issue <br />separately that has not been resolved and then summarize my position concern- <br />ing the final disposition of this matter. A copy of her letter is attached <br />for your information. <br /> <br />One of the questions addressed concerned the discrepancies found in the audit <br />schedules between costs in the detailed cumulative schedule compared to the <br />annual statements of revenue, expenditures, and fund balance. The amount in <br />question was $96,065 of which the City of Concord addressed $14,530. This <br />still leaves $81,535 in questioned costs which we believe needs further <br />resolution. <br /> <br /> <br />